I am trying to set up the database connection properties using JNDI for a Spring web application.
I am considering two approaches as below:
Approach 1:
In your Spring configuration you may have something like:
<jee:jndi-lookup id="dataSource" jndi-name="java:comp/env/jdbc/facs"/>
Then in your webapp /META-INF/context.xml file you should have something similar too:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!-- antiResourceLocking="true" -->
<Context path="/podd-apn"
reloadable="true"
cachingAllowed="false"
antiResourceLocking="true"
>
<Resource name="jdbc/facs"
type="javax.sql.DataSource" username="${database.username}" password="${database.password}"
driverClassName="org.postgresql.Driver"
url="${database.url}"
maxActive="8" maxIdle="4"
global="jdbc/facs"
/>
</Context>
And in your web.xml you should something like:
<!-- JNDI -->
<resource-ref>
<description>FACs Datasource</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/facs</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
Approach 2:
Setup in the Spring context like this:
<jee:jndi-lookup id="dbDataSource"
jndi-name="jdbc/DatabaseName"
expected-type="javax.sql.DataSource" />
You can declare the JNDI resource in Tomcat's server.xml using something like this:
<GlobalNamingResources>
<Resource name="jdbc/DatabaseName" auth="Container" type="javax.sql.DataSource"
username="dbUsername" password="dbPasswd"
url="jdbc:postgresql://localhost/dbname"
driverClassName="org.postgresql.Driver"
initialSize="5" maxWait="5000"
maxActive="120" maxIdle="5"
validationQuery="select 1"
poolPreparedStatements="true"/>
</GlobalNamingResources/>
And reference the JNDI resource from Tomcat's web context.xml like this:
<ResourceLink name="jdbc/DatabaseName"
global="jdbc/DatabaseName"
type="javax.sql.DataSource"/>
My question is where is the best place to keep database properties? Should they be placed in server.xml or context.xml?
Also, if I have 2 databases, should I use two configs?
Also, is it best practice to directly place them in either server.xml or context.xml? Or do I need to configure through Tomcat Manager GUI console?
Thanks!
I prefer a third approach that takes the best from
Approach 1 and Approach 2 described by user1016403.
Approach 3
- Save database properties on the
server.xml
- reference the
server.xml
database properties from the web application META-INF/context.xml
Approach 3 benefits
While the first point is useful for security reasons the second point is useful for referencing server properties value from the web application, even if server properties values will change.
Moreover decoupling resource definitions on the server from their use by the web application makes such configuration scalable across organizations with various complexity where different teams work on different tiers/layers: the server administrators team can work without conflicting with developers team if the administrator shares the same JNDI name with the developer for each resource.
Approach 3 implementation
Define the JNDI name jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName
.
Declare the jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName
's various properties and values in Tomcat's server.xml
using something like this:
<GlobalNamingResources>
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName" auth="Container" type="javax.sql.DataSource"
username="dbUsername" password="dbPasswd"
url="jdbc:postgresql://localhost/dbname"
driverClassName="org.postgresql.Driver"
initialSize="5" maxWait="5000"
maxActive="120" maxIdle="5"
validationQuery="select 1"
poolPreparedStatements="true"/>
</GlobalNamingResources/>
Link the jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName
's properties from web application META-INF/context.xml
by an application-private JNDI context java:comp/env/
specified in the name
attribute:
<Context path="/ApplicationContext" ... >
<!--
"global" attribute links to GlobalNamingResources in the ${catalina.base}/conf/server.xml (server administrator team)
"name" attribute is relative to the application-private JNDI context java:comp/env/ and is looked up from the java web application (application developer team)
-->
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName" name="jdbc/DatabaseName" type="javax.sql.DataSource"/>
</Context>
Finally, in order to use the JNDI resource, specify the JNDI name jdbc/DatabaseName
in web application's deployment descriptor:
<resource-ref>
<description>DatabaseName's Datasource</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DatabaseName</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
and in Spring context:
<jee:jndi-lookup id="DatabaseNameDataSource"
jndi-name="jdbc/DatabaseName"
expected-type="javax.sql.DataSource" />
Approach 3 drawbacks
If the JNDI name gets changed then both the server.xml
and the META-INF/context.xml
will have to be edited and a deploy would be necessary; nevertheless this scenario is rare.
Approach 3 variations
Many data sources used by one web application
Simply add configurations to Tomcat's server.xml
:
<GlobalNamingResources>
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName1" ... />
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName2" ... />
...
</GlobalNamingResources/>
Add link web application META-INF/context.xml
by an application-private JNDI context java:comp/env/
specified in the name
attribute:
<Context path="/ApplicationContext" ... >
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName1" name="jdbc/DatabaseName1" ... />
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContext_DatabaseName2" name="jdbc/DatabaseName2" ... />
...
</Context>
Finally add JNDI resources usage in web application's deployment descriptor:
<resource-ref>
<description>DatabaseName1's Datasource</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DatabaseName1</res-ref-name> ...
</resource-ref>
<resource-ref>
<description>DatabaseName2's Datasource</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DatabaseName2</res-ref-name> ...
</resource-ref>
...
and in Spring context:
<jee:jndi-lookup id="DatabaseName1DataSource"
jndi-name="jdbc/DatabaseName1" ... />
<jee:jndi-lookup id="DatabaseName2DataSource"
jndi-name="jdbc/DatabaseName2" ... />
...
Many data sources used by many web application on the same server
Simply add configuration to Tomcat's server.xml
:
<GlobalNamingResources>
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextX_DatabaseName1" ... />
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextX_DatabaseName2" ... />
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName1" ... />
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName2" ... />
...
</GlobalNamingResources/>
the others configuration should be deducible from previous variation case.
Many data sources to the same database used by many web application on the same server
In such case a Tomcat's server.xml
configurations like:
<GlobalNamingResources>
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextX_DatabaseName" ... />
<Resource name="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName" ... />
ends up in two different web applications META-INF/context.xml
like:
<Context path="/ApplicationContextX" ... >
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContextX_DatabaseName" name="jdbc/DatabaseName" ... />
</Context>
and like:
<Context path="/ApplicationContextY" ... >
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName" name="jdbc/DatabaseName" ... />
</Context>
so someone might be worried about the fact that the same name="jdbc/DatabaseName"
is looked up, and then used, by two different applications deployed on the same server: this is not a problem because the jdbc/DatabaseName
is an application-private JNDI context java:comp/env/
, so ApplicationContextX
by using java:comp/env/
can't (by design) look up the resource linked to global="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName"
.
Of course if you felt more relaxed without this worry you might use a different naming strategy like:
<Context path="/ApplicationContextX" ... >
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContextX_DatabaseName" name="jdbc/applicationXprivateDatabaseName" ... />
</Context>
and like:
<Context path="/ApplicationContextY" ... >
<ResourceLink global="jdbc/ApplicationContextY_DatabaseName" name="jdbc/applicationYprivateDatabaseName" ... />
</Context>
I prefer Approach 2 (put everything (not only some attribute in the config),
but instead of placing them in the global server.xml
or global context.xml
you should place it in the application specific context.xml.default
YOUR_APP.xml
in your tomcat.
The YOUR_APP.xml
file is located in $catalinaHome/conf/<engine>/<host>
(for example conf/Catalina/localhost/YOUR_APP.xml).
The configuration in application specific YOUR_APP.xml
is only available for the specific application.
Approach 4
Instead of using JNDI I work with .properties
files and build complex object during program initialization instead on configuration time.
You already use Spring and it is easy construct DataSource
by:
<context:property-placeholder location="classpath:app.properties"/>
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:oracle:thin:@${db.host}:${db.port}:${db.user}"/>
<property name="username" value="${db.user}"/>
<property name="password" value="${db.pass}"/>
</bean>
I completely agree with Ralph with using deployment descriptor in $CATALINA_BASE/conf/[enginename]/[hostname]/$APP.xml
but instead JNDI I like plain key-value file!
With Spring injecting above properties into bean fields are easy:
@Value("${db.user}") String defaultSchema;
instead of JNDI:
@Inject ApplicationContext context;
Enviroment env = context.getEnvironment();
String defaultSchema = env.getProperty("db.user");
Note also that EL allow this (default values and deep recursive substitution):
@Value('${db.user:testdb}') private String dbUserName;
<property name='username' value='${db.user.${env}}'/>
To externalize .properties
file I use modern Tomcat 7 that has org.apache.catalina.loader.VirtualWebappLoader:
<Loader className="org.apache.catalina.loader.VirtualWebappLoader"
virtualClasspath="/srv/web/app/"/>
So your devops fill virtualClasspath
with local external full paths which is separate per application and put local app.properties
to that dir.
See also:
- Adding a directory to tomcat classpath
- Can I create a custom classpath on a per application basis in Tomcat
- Externalizing Tomcat webapp config from .war file
- How to read a properties file outside my webapp context in Tomcat
- Configure Tomcat to use properties file to load DB connection information
- Externalize Tomcat configuration
You also can use JNDI URL support for different application configuration for test, integration test, production.
<Context>
...
<Resource auth="Container" factory="com.benasmussen.jndi.url.URLFactory"
name="url/MyUrl" type="java.net.URL" url="file:///your/path/to/file"/>
...
</Context>
<jee:jndi-lookup id="myUrl" jndi-name="java:comp/env/url/MyUrl" expected-type="java.net.URL" />
Check out the GitHub project Tomcat JNDI URL Support to enable JNDI URL support for Tomcat servers.
step 1: context.xml
<Context path="/projectname">
<Resource auth="Container"
driverClassName="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
logAbandoned="true"
maxActive="100" ``
maxIdle="30"
maxWait="10000"
name="refname"
removeAbandoned="true"
removeAbandonedTimeout="60"
type="javax.sql.DataSource"
url="jdbc:mysql://localhost:8080/dbname"
username="root"
password="root"/>
</Context>
Step 2 : web.xml
<resource-ref>
<description>DB Connection</description>
<res-ref-name>refname</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
Step 3 : create a class to get connection
Connection connection = null;
Context context = (Context) new InitialContext().lookup("java:comp/env");
DataSource ds = (DataSource) context.lookup("refname");
connection = ds.getConnection();
Everything is set