Does a user stored procedure with the prefix of SP (not SP_) have poorer performance by looking in the Master DB (similar to user SP named SP_) or does it look in the DB where the stored procedure exists because it lack an underscore?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
The reserved prefix that exhibits this behaviour is sp_
. Not sp
.
A stored procedure called spAddUser
will be resolved in the normal way without looking for a matching object in master
.
The relevant quote in books online is
Avoid the use of the
sp_
prefix when naming procedures. This prefix is used by SQL Server to designate system procedures. Using the prefix can cause application code to break if there is a system procedure with the same name.
But I would avoid these prefixes anyway. If all the stored procedures are prefixed sp
it quickly gets annoying IMO.