MatLab accumarray unexpectedly changing ordering

问题:

As long as I understood accumarray, it means "Making the nth row of the output: 1) find n in sub. 2) if n is in m1, m2, m3 th element in sub, 3) apply the function to m1,m2,m3 th element of val 4) that's the nth row of the output"

Am I wrong somewhere?

I ran the following code.

A = [2 10 13 ; 1 11 14; 1 12 10]
[U,ix,iu]= unique(A(:,1))
vals = reshape(A(:, 2:end).', [], 1)
subs = reshape(iu(:, ones(size(A, 2)-1,1)).', [], 1)
r2 = accumarray(subs, vals', [], @(x){x'})
r2{1}
r2{2}

A =

 2    10    13
 1    11    14
 1    12    10

U =

 1
 2

ix =

 3
 1

iu =

 2
 1
 1

vals =

10
13
11
14
12
10

subs =

 2
 2
 1
 1
 1
 1

r2 =

[1x4 double]
[1x2 double]

ans =

12    11    14    10

ans =

13    10

=========================

But I expected r{1} = 11 14 12 10, and r{2} = 10 13.

Why did accumarray suddenly changed the ordering?

How can I get the expected result?

回答1:

The documentation of accumarray says:

Note If the subscripts in subs are not sorted, fun should not depend on the order of the values in its input data.

And your subs is not sorted (at least not in ascending order). If you rewrite the code so that subs is sorted and vals is also rearranged accordingly you get the desired result:

A = [2 10 13 ; 1 11 14; 1 12 10]
[U,ix,iu]= unique(A(:,1))
vals = reshape(A(:, 2:end).', [], 1)
subs = reshape(iu(:, ones(size(A, 2)-1,1)).', [], 1)
[subs_sorted, I] = sort(subs);
r2 = accumarray(subs_sorted, vals(I)', [], @(x){x'})
r2{1}
r2{2}

And running this code returns:

ans =
    11    14    12    10
ans =
    10    13