Setters for collection type properties

问题:

Are setters necessary for Collection Type Properties

//Type 1    
class Company
{
    private IList<Customer> customers;

    public IList<Customer> Customers
    {
        get { return customers; }
        set { customers = value; }
    }
}

 //Type 2 
 class Company
 {
       private readonly IList<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>();

       public IList<Customer> Customers
       {
               get { return customers; }
       }
  }

When do I use Type 1 vs Type 2 ? Wouldn't it suffice if I initialize a List & use readonly property Customers ? as in Company.Customers.Add(new Customer)

What is the best practice with respect to providing setters for collection Type properties?

回答1:

Please read the FxCop recommondation CAS2227 "Collection properties should be read only" http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182327(VS.80).aspx

it contains good advice :)

回答2:

Not in general (and I don't normally add them), but they are necessary if you want to use XmlSerializer. Which is a pain. It must also be a concrete type (for example List<T> or T[] - not IList<T>). Fortunately, DataContractSerializer doesn't suffer the same fate.

回答3:

I prefer

public IList<Customer> Customers { get; private set; }

But this requries

this.Customers = new List<Customer>();

in Company constructor