How to run the Python program forever?

2019-01-09 02:51发布

问题:

I need to run my Python program forever in an infinite loop..

Currently I am running it like this -

#!/usr/bin/python

import time

# some python code that I want 
# to keep on running


# Is this the right way to run the python program forever?
# And do I even need this time.sleep call?
while True:
    time.sleep(5)

Is there any better way of doing it? Or do I even need time.sleep call? Any thoughts?

回答1:

Yes, you can use a while True: loop that never breaks to run Python code continually.

However, you will need to put the code you want to run continually inside the loop:

#!/usr/bin/python

while True:
    # some python code that I want 
    # to keep on running

Also, time.sleep is used to suspend the operation of a script for a period of time. So, since you want yours to run continually, I don't see why you would use it.



回答2:

How about this one?

import signal
signal.pause()

This will let your program sleep until it receives a signal from some other process (or itself, in another thread), letting it know it is time to do something.



回答3:

for OS's that support select:

import select

# your code

select.select([], [], [])


回答4:

Here is the complete syntax,

#!/usr/bin/python3

import time 

def your_function():
    print("Hello, World")

while True:
    your_function()
    time.sleep(10) #make function to sleep for 10 seconds


回答5:

All of the above code will surely help you to execute your code infinitely but if you want to run the code in the background with nohup.

nohup pythonScript.py


回答6:

sleep is a good way to avoid overload on the cpu

not sure if it's really clever, but I usually use

while(not sleep(5)):
    #code to execute

sleep method always returns None.



回答7:

I have a small script interruptableloop.py that runs the code at an interval (default 1sec), it pumps out a message to the screen while it's running, and traps an interrupt signal that you can send with CTL-C:

#!/usr/bin/python3
from interruptableLoop import InterruptableLoop

loop=InterruptableLoop(intervalSecs=1) # redundant argument
while loop.ShouldContinue():
   # some python code that I want 
   # to keep on running
   pass

When you run the script and then interrupt it you see this output, (the periods pump out on every pass of the loop):

[py36]$ ./interruptexample.py
CTL-C to stop   (or $kill -s SIGINT pid)
......^C
Exiting at  2018-07-28 14:58:40.359331

interruptableLoop.py:

"""
    Use to create a permanent loop that can be stopped ...

    ... from same terminal where process was started and is running in foreground: 
        CTL-C

    ... from same user account but through a different terminal 
        $ kill -2 <pid> 
        or $ kill -s SIGINT <pid>

"""
import signal
import time
from datetime import datetime as dtt
__all__=["InterruptableLoop",]
class InterruptableLoop:
    def __init__(self,intervalSecs=1,printStatus=True):
        self.intervalSecs=intervalSecs
        self.shouldContinue=True
        self.printStatus=printStatus
        self.interrupted=False
        if self.printStatus:
            print ("CTL-C to stop\t(or $kill -s SIGINT pid)")
        signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self._StopRunning)
        signal.signal(signal.SIGQUIT, self._Abort)
        signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, self._Abort)

    def _StopRunning(self, signal, frame):
        self.shouldContinue = False

    def _Abort(self, signal, frame):
        raise 

    def ShouldContinue(self):
        time.sleep(self.intervalSecs)
        if self.shouldContinue and self.printStatus: 
            print( ".",end="",flush=True)
        elif not self.shouldContinue and self.printStatus:
            print ("Exiting at ",dtt.now())
        return self.shouldContinue


回答8:

It's one of the only ways that I can think of. As to if it's appropriate, it depends on the use case - web servers and event loops sometimes do it like this. And no, you definitely do not need the time.sleep call.