What is the correct Solr fieldType to use for sort

问题:

I am using Solr 3.6.1. What is the correct field type to use for a Solr sort field containing integer values? I need this field only for sorting and will never do range queries on it. Should I use integer or sint?

I see that in schema.xml, there is sint type declared as:

 <!-- Numeric field types that manipulate the value into
         a string value that isn't human-readable in its internal form,
         but with a lexicographic ordering the same as the numeric ordering,
         so that range queries work correctly. -->
    <fieldType name="sint" class="solr.SortableIntField" sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>

whereas integer says the following:

 <!-- numeric field types that store and index the text
         value verbatim (and hence don't support range queries, since the
         lexicographic ordering isn't equal to the numeric ordering) -->
    <fieldType name="integer" class="solr.IntField" omitNorms="true"/>

The main reason I am asking this is because every Solr sort I do on an sint field (I have lots of them declared as dynamic fields) populates the (unconfigurable) lucene fieldCache. I see on the stats page (http://HOST:PORT/solr/CORE/admin/stats.jsp) under fieldCache that sint sorts are stored as

org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex

whereas integer sorts are stored as

org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache.DEFAULT_INT_PARSER

which I believe consumes less space?

---

UPDATE: Solr 3.6.1 schema.xml has int declared as TrieIntField i.e. as

<fieldType name="int" class="solr.TrieIntField" precisionStep="0" positionIncrementGap="0"/>

The one above was from an older solr version.

回答1:

If you don't need range queries, use "integer" as Sorts work correctly on both

Documentation :-

Sortable FieldTypes like sint, sdouble are a bit of a misnomer. They are not needed for Sorting in the sense described above, but are needed when doing RangeQuery queries. Sortables, in fact, refer to the notion of making the number sort correctly lexicographically as Strings. That is, if this is not done, the numbers 1..10 sort lexicographically as 1,10, 2, 3... Using an sint, however remedies this. If, however, you don't need to do RangeQuery queries and only need to sort on the field, then just use an int or double or the equivalent appropriate class. You will save yourself time and memory.

回答2:

The Sortable field types are being deprecated in Solr 5 and should not be used. You can use the solr int or tint field types