I have following object records
:
{
"notes":[
{
"id":1,
"description":"hey",
"userId":2,
"replyToId":null,
"postId":2,
"parentId":null
},
{
"id":5,
"description":"hey test",
"userId":3,
"replyToId":null,
"postId":2,
"parentId":null
},
{
"id":2,
"description":"how are you",
"userId":null,
"replyToId":2,
"postId":2,
"parentId":null,
"user":null
}
]
}
I want to output it as:
2
object with id 1
object with id 2 (because replyToId value is same as userId
3
object with id 5
So basically I want to consider UserId and replyToId value under the same group.
I have build my own mixin under lodash, wrapping groupBy method as:
mixin({
splitGroupBy: function(list, groupByIter){
if (_.isArray(groupByIter)) {
function groupBy(obj) {
return _.forEach(groupByIter, function (key){
if ( !!obj[key] ) return obj[key]
});
}
} else {
var groupBy = groupByIter;
}
debugger;
var groups = _.groupBy(list, groupBy);
return groups;
}
});
Call looks like this:
_.splitGroupBy(data.notes,['userId', 'replyToId']);
The output is coming without group. Even when I have tried with _.map
instead _.forEach
the split is not happening correctly.
A solution using underscore:
var props = ['userId', 'replyToId'];
var notNull = _.negate(_.isNull);
var groups = _.groupBy(record.notes, function(note){
return _.find(_.pick(note, props), notNull);
});
This can probably done much prettier, but it should work:
lodash.mixin({
splitGroupBy: function(list, groupByIter) {
var _ = this, groupBy;
if (lodash.isArray(groupByIter)) {
groupBy = function(obj) {
return _(obj) .pick(groupByIter)
.values()
.without(null, undefined)
.first();
};
} else {
groupBy = groupByIter;
}
var groups = _.groupBy(list, groupBy);
return groups;
}
});
You could map your list of attributes to their respective values and pick the first non falsy value as your group key:
_.mixin({
splitGroupBy: function(list, groupByIter){
if (!_.isArray(groupByIter))
return _.groupBy(list, groupByIter);
return _.groupBy(list, function(o) {
var values = _.map(groupByIter, function(k) {
return o[k];
});
return _.find(values);
});
}
});
var data = {
"notes":[
{
"id":1,
"userId":2,
"replyToId":null
},
{
"id":5,
"userId":3,
"replyToId":null
},
{
"id":2,
"userId":null,
"replyToId":2
}
]
};
_.mixin({
splitGroupBy: function(list, groupByIter){
if (!_.isArray(groupByIter))
return _.groupBy(list, groupByIter);
return _.groupBy(list, function(o) {
var values = _.map(groupByIter, function(k) {
return o[k];
});
return _.find(values);
});
}
});
snippet.log(JSON.stringify(_.splitGroupBy(data.notes,['userId', 'replyToId'])));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.8.3/underscore-min.js"></script>
<!-- Provides the `snippet` object, see http://meta.stackexchange.com/a/242144/134069 -->
<script src="http://tjcrowder.github.io/simple-snippets-console/snippet.js"></script>
Assuming userId
and replyToId
are mutually exclusive (i.e. you either have a userId
or a replyToId
, but never both) as they are in the sample data, then specifying a custom grouping function works:
_.groupBy(data.notes, function(note) {
return note.userId || note.replyToId;
});