JavaFX FXML controller - constructor vs initialize

问题:

My Application class looks like this:

public class Test extends Application {

    private static Logger logger = LogManager.getRootLogger();

    @Override
    public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {

        String resourcePath = \"/resources/fxml/MainView.fxml\";
        URL location = getClass().getResource(resourcePath);
        FXMLLoader fxmlLoader = new FXMLLoader(location);

        Scene scene = new Scene(fxmlLoader.load(), 500, 500);

        primaryStage.setScene(scene);
        primaryStage.show();
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        launch(args);
    }
}

The FXMLLoader creates an instance of the corresponding controller (given in the FXML file via fx:controller) by invoking first the default constructor and then the initialize method:

public class MainViewController {

    public MainViewController() {
        System.out.println(\"first\");
    }

    @FXML
    public void initialize() {
        System.out.println(\"second\");
    }
}

The output is:

first
second

So, why does the initialize method exist? What is the difference between using a constructor or the initialize method to initialize the controller required things?

Thanks for your suggestions!

回答1:

In a few words: The constructor is called first, then any @FXML annotated fields are populated, then initialize() is called. So the constructor does NOT have access to @FXML fields referring to components defined in the .fxml file, while initialize() does have access to them.

Quoting from the Introduction to FXML:

[...] the controller can define an initialize() method, which will be called once on an implementing controller when the contents of its associated document have been completely loaded [...] This allows the implementing class to perform any necessary post-processing on the content.

回答2:

The initialize method is called after all @FXML annotated members have been injected. Suppose you have a table view you want to populate with data:

class MyController { 
    @FXML
    TableView<MyModel> tableView; 

    public MyController() {
        tableView.getItems().addAll(getDataFromSource()); // results in NullPointerException, as tableView is null at this point. 
    }

    @FXML
    public void initialize() {
        tableView.getItems().addAll(getDataFromSource()); // Perfectly Ok here, as FXMLLoader already populated all @FXML annotated members. 
    }
}

回答3:

In Addition to the above answers, there probably should be noted that there is a better way to implement the initialization. There is an interface called Initializable from the fxml library.

import javafx.fxml.Initializable;

class MyController implements Initializable {
    @FXML private TableView<MyModel> tableView;

    @Override
    public void initialize(URL location, ResourceBundle resources) {
        tableView.getItems().addAll(getDataFromSource());
    }
}

Parameters:

location - The location used to resolve relative paths for the root object, or null if the location is not known.
resources - The resources used to localize the root object, or null if the root object was not localized. 

And the note of the docs why the simple way of using @FXML public void initialize() works:

NOTE This interface has been superseded by automatic injection of location and resources properties into the controller. FXMLLoader will now automatically call any suitably annotated no-arg initialize() method defined by the controller. It is recommended that the injection approach be used whenever possible.