I have an UML diagram on which I want to mark some classes as singletons (because they are). How do I do that? Do I invent a new stereotype or do I just add a comment or are there some existing means to do that?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
Craig Larman's "Applying UML and Patterns" book (3rd edition) gives the following notation for a sequence diagram:
Note that it implies that before calling doA
the :Register
object manages to get access to the singleton via the standard way, e.g., getInstance()
. This makes the diagram more agile.
For a class diagram:
回答2:
"What will most clearly represent the concept to your reader."
There is a reasonable example of the basic appearance over on Wikipedia. It shows a private constructor and a public getInstance()
method that returns an object of type Singleton
. I'd also find a stereotype to be a perfectly reasonable way to make it explicit without requiring your reader to parse the details of the class object.