可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I have model Person that has many Images, where images has a Paperclip attachment field called data, an abbreviated version displayed below:
class Person
has_many :images
...
end
class Image
has_attached_file :data
belongs_to :person
...
end
Person is required to have at least one Image attached to it.
When using FactoryGirl, I have code akin to the following:
Factory.define :image do |a|
a.data { File.new(File.join(Rails.root, 'features', 'support', 'file.png')) }
a.association :person
end
Factory.define :person do |p|
p.first_name 'Keyzer'
p.last_name 'Soze'
p.after_create do |person|
person.assets = [Factory.build(:image, :person => person)]
end
# p.images {|images| [images.association(:image)]}
end
(N.B. I have also tried the code commented out above was also tried)
Most of the time when I run cucumber features, I get an error akin to the following:
No such file or directory - /tmp/stream,9887,0.png (Errno::ENOENT)
...
Sometimes the tests run successfully.
Can anyone tell me what the problem is I am having here or how they use FactoryGirl and Paperclip together to achieve something like what I am trying to achieve?
I am using Rails 3.
回答1:
You can use fixture_file_upload
include ActionDispatch::TestProcess
in your test helper, here is an example factory:
include ActionDispatch::TestProcess
FactoryBot.define do
factory :user do
avatar { fixture_file_upload(Rails.root.join('spec', 'photos', 'test.png'), 'image/png') }
end
end
In the above example, spec/photos/test.png
needs to exist in your application's root directory before running your tests.
Note, that FactoryBot
is a new name for FactoryGirl
.
回答2:
Newer FG syntax and no includes necessary
factory :user do
avatar { File.new(Rails.root.join('app', 'assets', 'images', 'rails.png')) }
end
or, better yet,
factory :user do
avatar { File.new("#{Rails.root}/spec/support/fixtures/image.jpg") }
end
回答3:
Desmond Bowe over at Pivotal Labs suggests avoiding fixture_file_upload due to memory leak problems. Instead, you should set the paperclip fields directly in your factory:
factory :attachment do
supporting_documentation_file_name { 'test.pdf' }
supporting_documentation_content_type { 'application/pdf' }
supporting_documentation_file_size { 1024 }
# ...
end
回答4:
I've been using the code in the gist below:
Rails 2
http://gist.github.com/162881
Rails 3
https://gist.github.com/313121
回答5:
file { File.new(Rails.root.join('spec', 'fixtures', 'filename.png')) }
回答6:
Try using ActionController::TestUploadedFile. You can just set the file property to an instance of TestUploadedFile and paperclip should take care of the rest. For example
valid_file = File.new(File.join(Rails.root, 'features', 'support', 'file.png'))
p.images {
[
ActionController::TestUploadedFile.new(valid_file, Mime::Type.new('application/png'))
]
}
回答7:
The above answers in some cases can help, and the one actually helped in one of my situations, but when using a Carrierwave, the previous solution from this question didn't work out this time.
FIRST APPROACH:
For me adding an after :create
solved the problem for me like this:
after :create do |b|
b.update_column(:video_file, File.join(Rails.root, 'spec', 'fixtures', 'sample.mp4'))
end
Setting inline video file like video_file { File.new("#{Rails.root}/spec/fixtures/sample.mp4") }
didn't work out and it was reporting errors.
SECOND APPROACH:
Define a factory like this (change personal_file
to your attachment name):
FactoryGirl.define do
factory :contact do
personal_file { File.new("#{Rails.root}/spec/fixtures/personal_files/my_test_file.csv") }
personal_file_content_type 'text/csv'
end
end
And add these lines to theconfig/environemnts/test.rb
:
config.paperclip_defaults = {
url: "#{Rails.root}/spec/fixtures/:attachment/:filename",
use_timestamp: false
}
回答8:
What are you testing exactly? That paperclip will successfully attach the file? That really seems like a test that paperclip should handle, not your application.
Have you tried
a.data { File.join(Rails.root, 'features', 'support', 'file.png') }
We use Machinist instead of factory_girl and have just used things like
Image.blueprint do
image { RAILS_ROOT + 'spec/fixtures/images/001.jpg' }
end
Though, we aren't really testing much when we do this, we typically just want to have a valid Image
object.