Disable Java reflection for the current thread

问题:

I need to call some semi-trustworthy Java code and want to disable the ability to use reflection for the duration of that code's execution.

try{
   // disable reflection somehow
   someObject.method();
}
finally{
   // enable reflection again
}

Can this be done with a SecurityManager, and if so, how?

Clarification/Context: This is a follow-up to another question about restricting the packages that can be called from JavaScript/Rhino. The accepted answer references a blog entry on how to do that, and it requires two steps, the first one using a Rhino API (ClassShutter), the second one turning off reflection and Class.forName(). I was thinking I can do that second step more cleanly using a SecurityManager (learning about SecurityManager, which as has been pointed out, is a complex beast, along the way).

To sum up, I want (from code, not setting file) to turn off Class.forName() and any access to the whole reflection package.

回答1:

It depends on what you are trying to restrict.

In general, publicly accessible API is not restricted. However, as long as you don't grant the untrustworthy code the ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks") permission, it won't be able to get access to non-public API in another package.

If you have a list of packages to which you want to restrict all access, there are two steps. First, in the Security properties, include the restricted package in the package.access list. Then give your trusted code RuntimePermission("accessClassInPackage." + pkg).

A common way to distinguish your untrusted code is to load it from a different location, and refer to the different codebases in your policy file when granting permissions.

The Java security architecture is very powerful, but I know it is also complicated; if you would like a more concrete example, please describe exactly what calls you want to restrict and I'll try to be more explicit.

---

To do what you want without modifying the java.policy file and/or the java.security file would be very difficult, maybe impossible. The java.security.Policy represents the information in java.policy, but it doesn't offer write access. You could create your own Policy implementation and install it at runtime as long as any existing SecurityManager permits it.

On the other hand, you can specify a custom java.policy file as a command-line option. If you are providing a complete application with some sort of launcher, that might be easily accomplished. It also provides some transparency to your users. A sophisticated user can review the permissions you'd like to have granted to the application.

回答2:

Well, you can override SecurityManager.checkMemberAccess and give a stricter definition. However, it doesn't really work like that. What happens for instance if the code defines a finaliser?

On the clarification: Other APIs use reflection and other APIs. For instance, java.beans, LiveConnect and Rhino. An adversary could from within a script, say, create a new Rhino context without the shutter and thereby bootstrap into the full JRE. With an open system, a blacklist can never be finished.

In summary: to use the Java security model you need to work with it, not against it.

回答3:

I wrote a replacement of ClassShutter that allows fine grained access control, per instance, per method, per field:

http://riven8192.blogspot.com/2010/07/java-rhino-fine-grained-classshutter.html