Subset dataframe by multiple logical conditions of

2019-01-01 09:09发布

问题:

I would like to subset (filter) a dataframe by specifying which rows not (!) to keep in the new dataframe. Here is a simplified sample dataframe:

data
v1 v2 v3 v4
a  v  d  c
a  v  d  d
b  n  p  g
b  d  d  h    
c  k  d  c    
c  r  p  g
d  v  d  x
d  v  d  c
e  v  d  b
e  v  d  c

For example, if a row of column v1 has a \"b\", \"d\", or \"e\", I want to get rid of that row of observations, producing the following dataframe:

v1 v2 v3 v4
a  v  d  c
a  v  d  d
c  k  d  c    
c  r  p  g

I have been successful at subsetting based on one condition at a time. For example, here I remove rows where v1 contains a \"b\":

sub.data <- data[data[ , 1] != \"b\", ]

However, I have many, many such conditions, so doing it one at a time is not desirable. I have not been successful with the following:

sub.data <- data[data[ , 1] != c(\"b\", \"d\", \"e\")

or

sub.data <- subset(data, data[ , 1] != c(\"b\", \"d\", \"e\"))

I\'ve tried some other things as well, like !%in%, but that doesn\'t seem to exist. Any ideas?

回答1:

The ! should be around the outside of the statement:

data[!(data$v1 %in% c(\"b\", \"d\", \"e\")), ]

  v1 v2 v3 v4
1  a  v  d  c
2  a  v  d  d
5  c  k  d  c
6  c  r  p  g


回答2:

Try this

subset(data, !(v1 %in% c(\"b\",\"d\",\"e\")))


回答3:

You can also accomplish this by breaking things up into separate logical statements by including & to separate the statements.

subset(my.df, my.df$v1 != \"b\" & my.df$v1 != \"d\" & my.df$v1 != \"e\")

This is not elegant and takes more code but might be more readable to newer R users. As pointed out in a comment above, subset is a \"convenience\" function that is best used when working interactively.



回答4:

data <- data[-which(data[,1] %in% c(\"b\",\"d\",\"e\")),]


回答5:

This answer is more meant to explain why, not how. The \'==\' operator in R is vectorized in a same way as the \'+\' operator. It matches the elements of whatever is on the left side to the elements of whatever is on the right side, per element. For example:

> 1:3 == 1:3
[1] TRUE TRUE TRUE

Here the first test is 1==1 which is TRUE, the second 2==2 and the third 3==3. Notice that this returns a FALSE in the first and second element because the order is wrong:

> 3:1 == 1:3
[1] FALSE  TRUE FALSE

Now if one object is smaller then the other object then the smaller object is repeated as much as it takes to match the larger object. If the size of the larger object is not a multiplication of the size of the smaller object you get a warning that not all elements are repeated. For example:

>  1:2 == 1:3
[1]  TRUE  TRUE FALSE
Warning message:
In 1:2 == 1:3 :
  longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length

Here the first match is 1==1, then 2==2, and finally 1==3 (FALSE) because the left side is smaller. If one of the sides is only one element then that is repeated:

> 1:3 == 1
[1]  TRUE FALSE FALSE

The correct operator to test if an element is in a vector is indeed \'%in%\' which is vectorized only to the left element (for each element in the left vector it is tested if it is part of any object in the right element).

Alternatively, you can use \'&\' to combine two logical statements. \'&\' takes two elements and checks elementwise if both are TRUE:

> 1:3 == 1 & 1:3 != 2
[1]  TRUE FALSE FALSE


回答6:

my.df <- read.table(textConnection(\"
v1 v2 v3 v4
a  v  d  c
a  v  d  d
b  n  p  g
b  d  d  h    
c  k  d  c    
c  r  p  g
d  v  d  x
d  v  d  c
e  v  d  b
e  v  d  c\"), header = TRUE)

my.df[which(my.df$v1 != \"b\" & my.df$v1 != \"d\" & my.df$v1 != \"e\" ), ]

  v1 v2 v3 v4
1  a  v  d  c
2  a  v  d  d
5  c  k  d  c
6  c  r  p  g


回答7:

sub.data<-data[ data[,1] != \"b\"  & data[,1] != \"d\" & data[,1] != \"e\" , ]

Larger but simple to understand (I guess) and can be used with multiple columns, even with !is.na( data[,1]).



回答8:

And also

library(dplyr)
data %>% filter(!v1 %in% c(\"b\", \"d\", \"e\"))

or

data %>% filter(v1 != \"b\" & v1 != \"d\" & v1 != \"e\")

or

data %>% filter(v1 != \"b\", v1 != \"d\", v1 != \"e\")

Since the & operator is implied by the comma.