I am struggling to understand why the following code does not allow an implicit conversion to occur.
#include <string>
using namespace std;
struct HasConversionToString {
HasConversionToString(const string& s_) : s{s_} {}
string s;
operator const string&() const { return s; }
};
int main() {
string s{"a"};
HasConversionToString obj{"b"};
return s < obj;
}
Both clang and gcc fail to find a valid way to compare the two objects with errors along the lines of:
clang++ -std=c++14 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic conversion.cpp -o test
conversion.cpp:13:12: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('string' (aka 'basic_string<char>') and 'HasConversionToString')
return s < obj;
~ ^ ~~~
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_pair.h:220:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'pair' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const pair<_T1, _T2>& __x, const pair<_T1, _T2>& __y)
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:298:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'reverse_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const reverse_iterator<_Iterator>& __x,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:348:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'reverse_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const reverse_iterator<_IteratorL>& __x,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:849:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'__normal_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const __normal_iterator<_IteratorL, _Container>& __lhs,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:856:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'__normal_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const __normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>& __lhs,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:1089:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'move_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const move_iterator<_IteratorL>& __x,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/stl_iterator.h:1095:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'move_iterator' against 'basic_string'
operator<(const move_iterator<_Iterator>& __x,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/basic_string.h:4989:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'basic_string<type-parameter-0-0, type-parameter-0-1, type-parameter-0-2>' against 'HasConversionToString'
operator<(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/basic_string.h:5001:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'const _CharT *' against 'HasConversionToString'
operator<(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.3.0/../../../../include/c++/5.3.0/bits/basic_string.h:5013:5: note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'const _CharT *' against 'string' (aka 'basic_string<char>')
operator<(const _CharT* __lhs,
^
1 error generated.
whereas the following code works fine, when I explicitly cast the object to a string.
#include <string>
using namespace std;
struct HasConversionToString {
HasConversionToString(const string& s_) : s{s_} {}
string s;
operator const string&() const { return s; }
};
int main() {
string s{"a"};
HasConversionToString obj{"b"};
return s < static_cast<string>(obj);
}
based on the rules and examples listed on cppreference for implicit casts, I see no reason this shouldn't work. I assume that both clang and gcc didn't screw up the same thing, so I imagine that I've got a conceptual misunderstanding.