可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
If I want to expand a C macro, what are some good ways to do that (besides tracing it manually)?
For instance, GTK_WIDGET_SET_FLAGS
, it uses a macro that uses a macro that uses a macro (or two) ...
I want to just see it somehow expanded automagically, instead of searching for every macro, every step of the way.
UPDATE
I tried cpp, but it seemed to only do the first pass
on:
GTK_WIDGET_SET_FLAGS(obj, 13)
I got the include file expanded, and then:
G_STMT_START{ ((GTK_OBJECT_FLAGS (obj)) |= (13)); }G_STMT_END
This is explained by these error message I get this on stderr (when using -o filename)
gtk/gtkwidget.h:34:21: gdk/gdk.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:35:31: gtk/gtkaccelgroup.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:36:27: gtk/gtkobject.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:37:31: gtk/gtkadjustment.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:38:26: gtk/gtkstyle.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:39:29: gtk/gtksettings.h: No such file or directory
gtk/gtkwidget.h:40:21: atk/atk.h: No such file or directory
the gtk, atk, and gdk directories are all in the current working directory, so how do I let cpp search in it?
btw, gcc -E
gives the exact same output as cpp
Update2:
The include path problem is solved by using gcc -E and passing the include directory with the -I option
回答1:
Depending on which compiler you use, there should be a way to see the code after the preprocessor (which does the macro expansion, macros are not known by the compiler at all) is done.
With gcc, the option is -E. Here's a simplified example, using toy code and not the actual GTK+ macro:
~/tmp> cat cpptest.c
#define SET_FLAGS(w, f) ((w)->flags |= (f))
int main(void)
{
SET_FLAGS(0, 4711);
return 0;
}
~/tmp> gcc -E cpptest.c
# 1 "cpptest.c"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command line>"
# 1 "cpptest.c"
int main(void)
{
((0)->flags |= (4711));
return 0;
}
回答2:
In Visual Studio, you can generate the preprocessor resulted translation unit file. You can go project options, C/C++/Preprocessor and put "Generate Preprocessed File" or "Preprocess to a File" on Yes (or use /P or /EP compiler switch to include line numbers or not).
回答3:
You can dump the expansion of a macro at run time like this:
#include <stdio.h>
/*
* generic helper macros
*/
#define CALL(macro, arguments) macro arguments
#define STR(...) STR_(__VA_ARGS__)
#define STR_(...) # __VA_ARGS__
/*
* dumps a macro and its expansion to stdout
* the second argument is optional and specifies the number of
* arguments that macro takes: 0 means macro takes zero arguments
* no second argument means macro is not function-like
*/
#define DUMP_MACRO(macro, ...) \
do { \
puts ( \
"'" \
# macro STR(DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_ ## __VA_ARGS__) \
"' expands to '" \
STR(CALL(macro, DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_ ## __VA_ARGS__)) \
"'" \
); \
} while (0)
/* helpers for DUMP_MACRO, add more if required */
#define DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_
#define DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_0 ()
#define DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_1 (<1>)
#define DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_2 (<1>, <2>)
#define DUMP_MACRO_ARGS_3 (<1>, <2>, <3>)
/*
* macros to be used in examples for DUMP_MACRO
*/
#define EXAMPLE ( EXAMPLE0() << 9 )
#define EXAMPLE0() __GNUC__
#define EXAMPLE1(EXAMPLE1) EXAMPLE1
#define EXAMPLE3(EXAMPLE1, _, __) ( EXAMPLE1 ? _(__) : false )
int main() {
/* examples */
DUMP_MACRO(EXAMPLE);
DUMP_MACRO(EXAMPLE0, 0);
DUMP_MACRO(EXAMPLE1, 1);
DUMP_MACRO(EXAMPLE3, 3);
DUMP_MACRO(EXAMPLE3(EXAMPLE, EXAMPLE1, non_macro_symbol));
/* does not work for DUMP_MACRO itself, because the
preprocessor does not allow recursion */
DUMP_MACRO(DUMP_MACRO, 1);
DUMP_MACRO(DUMP_MACRO, 2);
return 0;
}
The program prints:
'EXAMPLE' expands to '( 4 << 9 )'
'EXAMPLE0()' expands to '4'
'EXAMPLE1(<1>)' expands to '<1>'
'EXAMPLE3(<1>, <2>, <3>)' expands to '( <1> ? <2>(<3>) : false )'
'EXAMPLE3(EXAMPLE, EXAMPLE1, non_macro_symbol)' expands to '( ( 4 << 9 ) ? non_macro_symbol : false )'
'DUMP_MACRO(<1>)' expands to 'DUMP_MACRO (<1>)'
'DUMP_MACRO(<1>, <2>)' expands to 'DUMP_MACRO (<1>, <2>)'
However this yields only the full expansion. If you need single steps, Eclipse/CDT can help, but only if you teach it all the headers and compiler flags you use.
回答4:
回答5:
If you use gcc you can also run
cpp myfile.c
回答6:
Many IDEs will show you the expanded version of the macro in the editor when the mouse pointer hovers over the identifier (or some other way). I know Eclipse/CDT does this, and Visual Studio does this (at least VS 2008 does).
Having the compiler generate preprocessed output can be useful if you're tracking down a tricky problem, but for day in/day out use where you just want to know what's going on with the code on your screen,using the IDE is the way to go.
回答7:
gcc even with -E needs the path of the header files ... like -I _path_to_your_headers...
If you've a Makefile, generally, what you could do is over-riding CC with gcc -E
Generally, cpp is only a script adding some flags to gcc for the preprocessor, like traditional...
回答8:
You want to run just the preprocessor stage of your compiler, responsible for expanding macros. For gcc
, that's "gcc -E", but I'm not sure about other compilers.
回答9:
Try running cpp on your source file
回答10:
Have you tried running gcc -E multiple times until there are no longer any macros?
回答11:
When trapped in a sketchy IDE, try something like
#define DISPLAY_VALUE2(x) #x
#define DISPLAY_VALUE(x) DISPLAY_VALUE2(x)
#pragma message("#DEFINE F_CPU " DISPLAY_VALUE(F_CPU))
to produce
…/sketch_may21a.ino: In function 'void loop()':
…/sketch_may21a.ino:10:54: note: #pragma message: #DEFINE F_CPU 16000000L
#pragma message("#DEFINE F_CPU " DISPLAY_VALUE(F_CPU))
^
thanks to "mdematos" at http://MicroChip.com/forums/m724722.aspx