Assume I have a named scope:
class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base
named_scope :bar, :conditions => 'some_field = 1'
end
This works great for queries and I have a bunch of useful named_scopes defined. What I would like is to be able to do this:
f = Foo.find(:first)
f.some_field = 1
f.is_bar? #=> true
The '.bar?' method will simply return true or false if the model instance falls within the named scope. Is there anyway to do this without writing an 'is_bar?' method even though I've already written a good way to check if something 'is_bar?' If I remember correctly, DRY is good so any help would be greatly appreciated/
You can call the exists?
method on a named scope which will query the database to see if the given record exists with those conditions.
Foo.bar.exists?(f)
However this will not work if you have changed the attributes on f
and not saved it to the database. This is because the named scope conditions are SQL so the check must happen there. Attempting to convert to Ruby if
conditions is messy, especially in more complex scenarios.
If your scopes are simple, you probably want to avoid code duplication. My solution allows you to call model.active?
to know if an instance belongs to the scope, and Model.active
to find all records matching the scope. model.active?
doesn't involve any database queries.
consider adding this to config/initializers/scope_and_method.rb
:
require 'active_record/named_scope'
module ActiveRecord::NamedScope::ClassMethods
def scope_and_method field, *values
field = field.to_sym
values.each do |value|
named_scope value.to_sym, :conditions => {field => value}
define_method "#{value}?" do
send(field.to_sym) == value
end
end
end
end
Usage:
scope_and_method :state, 'active', 'inactive'
Works as if it was:
named_scope :active, :conditions => {:state => 'active'}
named_scope :inactive, :conditions => {:state => 'inactive'}
def active?
state == 'active'
end
def inactive?
state == 'inactive'
end
This is a solution for Rails 2.3. This needs a very small tuning for Rails 3 and 4. (named_scope
-> scope
) I will check it soon.