可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
From what I know, PowerShell doesn't seem to have a built-in expression for the so-called ternary operator.
For example, in the C language, which supports the ternary operator, I could write something like:
<condition> ? <condition-is-true> : <condition-is-false>;
If that doesn't really exist in PowerShell, what would be the best way (i.e. easy to read and to maintain) to accomplish the same result?
回答1:
$result = If ($condition) {"true"} Else {"false"}
Everything else is incidental complexity and thus to be avoided.
For use in or as an expression, not just an assignment, wrap it in $()
, thus:
write-host $(If ($condition) {"true"} Else {"false"})
回答2:
The closest PowerShell construct I've been able to come up with to emulate that is:
@({'condition is false'},{'condition is true'})[$condition]
回答3:
Per this PowerShell blog post, you can create an alias to define a ?:
operator:
set-alias ?: Invoke-Ternary -Option AllScope -Description "PSCX filter alias"
filter Invoke-Ternary ([scriptblock]$decider, [scriptblock]$ifTrue, [scriptblock]$ifFalse)
{
if (&$decider) {
&$ifTrue
} else {
&$ifFalse
}
}
Use it like this:
$total = ($quantity * $price ) * (?: {$quantity -le 10} {.9} {.75})
回答4:
I too, looked for a better answer, and while the solution in Edward's post is "ok", I came up with a far more natural solution in this blog post
Short and sweet:
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Name: Invoke-Assignment
# Alias: =
# Author: Garrett Serack (@FearTheCowboy)
# Desc: Enables expressions like the C# operators:
# Ternary:
# <condition> ? <trueresult> : <falseresult>
# e.g.
# status = (age > 50) ? "old" : "young";
# Null-Coalescing
# <value> ?? <value-if-value-is-null>
# e.g.
# name = GetName() ?? "No Name";
#
# Ternary Usage:
# $status == ($age > 50) ? "old" : "young"
#
# Null Coalescing Usage:
# $name = (get-name) ? "No Name"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# returns the evaluated value of the parameter passed in,
# executing it, if it is a scriptblock
function eval($item) {
if( $item -ne $null ) {
if( $item -is "ScriptBlock" ) {
return & $item
}
return $item
}
return $null
}
# an extended assignment function; implements logic for Ternarys and Null-Coalescing expressions
function Invoke-Assignment {
if( $args ) {
# ternary
if ($p = [array]::IndexOf($args,'?' )+1) {
if (eval($args[0])) {
return eval($args[$p])
}
return eval($args[([array]::IndexOf($args,':',$p))+1])
}
# null-coalescing
if ($p = ([array]::IndexOf($args,'??',$p)+1)) {
if ($result = eval($args[0])) {
return $result
}
return eval($args[$p])
}
# neither ternary or null-coalescing, just a value
return eval($args[0])
}
return $null
}
# alias the function to the equals sign (which doesn't impede the normal use of = )
set-alias = Invoke-Assignment -Option AllScope -Description "FearTheCowboy's Invoke-Assignment."
Which makes it easy to do stuff like (more examples in blog post):
$message == ($age > 50) ? "Old Man" :"Young Dude"
回答5:
Since a ternary operator is usually used when assigning value, it should return a value. This is the way that can work:
$var=@("value if false","value if true")[[byte](condition)]
Stupid, but working. Also this construction can be used to quickly turn an int into another value, just add array elements and specify an expression that returns 0-based non-negative values.
回答6:
Since I have used this many times already and didn't see it listed here, I'll add my piece :
$var = @{$true="this is true";$false="this is false"}[1 -eq 1]
ugliest of all !
kinda source
回答7:
Try powershell's switch statement as an alternative, especially for variable assignment - multiple lines, but readable.
Example,
$WinVer = switch ( Test-Path $Env:windir\SysWOW64 ) {
$true { "64-bit" }
$false { "32-bit" }
}
"This version of Windows is $WinVer"
回答8:
I've recently improved (open PullRequest) the ternary conditional and null-coalescing operators in the PoweShell lib 'Pscx'
Pls have a look for my solution.
My github topic branch: UtilityModule_Invoke-Operators
Functions:
Invoke-Ternary
Invoke-TernaryAsPipe
Invoke-NullCoalescing
NullCoalescingAsPipe
Aliases
Set-Alias :?: Pscx\Invoke-Ternary -Description "PSCX alias"
Set-Alias ?: Pscx\Invoke-TernaryAsPipe -Description "PSCX alias"
Set-Alias :?? Pscx\Invoke-NullCoalescing -Description "PSCX alias"
Set-Alias ?? Pscx\Invoke-NullCoalescingAsPipe -Description "PSCX alias"
Usage
<condition_expression> |?: <true_expression> <false_expression>
<variable_expression> |?? <alternate_expression>
As expression you can pass:
$null, a literal, a variable, an 'external' expression ($b -eq 4) or a scriptblock {$b -eq 4}
If a variable in the variable expression is $null or not existing, the alternate expression is evaluated as output.
回答9:
PowerShell currently doesn't have a native Inline If (or ternary If) but you could consider to use the custom cmdlet:
IIf <condition> <condition-is-true> <condition-is-false>
See: PowerShell Inline If (IIf)
回答10:
Here's an alternative custom function approach:
function Test-TernaryOperatorCondition {
[CmdletBinding()]
param (
[Parameter(ValueFromPipeline = $true, Mandatory = $true)]
[bool]$ConditionResult
,
[Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 0)]
[PSObject]$ValueIfTrue
,
[Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 1)]
[ValidateSet(':')]
[char]$Colon
,
[Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 2)]
[PSObject]$ValueIfFalse
)
process {
if ($ConditionResult) {
$ValueIfTrue
}
else {
$ValueIfFalse
}
}
}
set-alias -Name '???' -Value 'Test-TernaryOperatorCondition'
Example
1 -eq 1 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
1 -eq 2 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
Differences Explained
- Why is it 3 question marks instead of 1?
- The
?
character is already an alias for Where-Object
.
??
is used in other languages as a null coalescing operator, and I wanted to avoid confusion.
- Why do we need the pipe before the command?
- Since I'm utilising the pipeline to evaluate this, we still need this character to pipe the condition into our function
- What happens if I pass in an array?
- We get a result for each value; i.e.
-2..2 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
gives: match, match, nomatch, match, match
(i.e. since any non-zero int evaluates to true
; whilst zero evaluates to false
).
- If you don't want that, convert the array to a bool;
([bool](-2..2)) |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
(or simply: [bool](-2..2) |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
)