Just starting to get my head around getting JMS ActiveMQ Acknowledgements
working in Spring. So far I have a consumer working perfectly, with the exception that when I don't acknowledge the message, it's still taken from the queue (I expect it to stay there or end in a dead letter queue).
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:jms="http://www.springframework.org/schema/jms"
xmlns:p="http://www.springframework.org/schema/p"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/jms http://www.springframework.org/schema/jms/spring-jms-3.0.xsd">
<!-- A JMS connection factory for ActiveMQ -->
<bean id="connectionFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"
p:brokerURL="failover://(tcp://jms1:61616,tcp://jms2:61616)?randomize=false&jms.redeliveryPolicy.maximumRedeliveries=5" />
<!-- A POJO that implements the JMS message listener -->
<bean id="simpleMessageListener" class="com.company.ConsumerClass" />
<!-- A JMS namespace aware Spring configuration for the message listener container -->
<jms:listener-container
container-type="default"
connection-factory="connectionFactory"
acknowledge="client"
concurrency="10-50"
cache="consumer">
<jms:listener destination="someQueue" ref="simpleMessageListener" method="onMessage" />
</jms:listener-container>
</beans>
In the ConsumerClass, my simple consumer looks something like this:
@Override public final void onMessage(Message message) {
Object postedMessage = null;
try {
postedMessage = ((ObjectMessage) message).getObject();
if (postedMessage.getClass() == SomeMessageType.class) {
try {
//Some logic here
message.acknowledge();
return; //Success Here
} catch (MyException e) {
logger.error("Could not process message, but as I didn't call acknowledge I expect it to end up in the dead message queue");
}
}
} catch (JMSException e) {
logger.error("Error occurred pulling Message from Queue", e);
}
//Also worth noting, if I throw new RuntimeException("Aww Noos"); here then it won't take it from the queue, but it won't get consumed (or end up as dead letter)...
}
Read this documentation: Spring JMS container does not use the message.acknowledge()
The listener container offers the following message acknowledgment options:
"sessionAcknowledgeMode" set to "AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE" (default): Automatic message acknowledgment before listener execution; no redelivery in case of exception thrown.
"sessionAcknowledgeMode" set to "CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE": Automatic message acknowledgment after successful listener execution; no redelivery in case of exception thrown.
"sessionAcknowledgeMode" set to "DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE": Lazy message acknowledgment during or after listener execution; potential redelivery in case of exception thrown.
"sessionTransacted" set to "true": Transactional acknowledgment after successful listener execution; guaranteed redelivery in case of exception thrown.
I found the answer at http://ourcraft.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/simple-jms-transaction-rollbacks-work/
It appears it works well if you change acknowledge="transacted" and make sure you throw new RuntimeException("Message could not be consumed. Roll back transaction"); at the end of the OnMessage() routine.
Still no idea what acknowledge="client" achieves though
Nowadays Spring provides good wrapper over plain JMS
message listeners.
See JavaDocs of AbstractMessageListenerContainer.
"sessionAcknowledgeMode"
set to "CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE"
: Automatic message acknowledgment after successful listener execution; best-effort redelivery in case of a user exception thrown as well as in case of other listener execution interruptions (such as the JVM
dying).
So, when you define a @JmsListener method, the acknowledgement is sent automatically when it's completed successfully, but you can throw an exception to receive the message again.
In my practice client acknowledgement rarely if ever used. Typical setup is auto acknowledge so if your code returns from onMessage() normally (w/o exception) the message is automatically acknowledged. If your code throws exception from onMessage() there is no acknowledgement and message typically would be re-delivered up to pre-configured number of times, after which it would typically be discarded or put into dead message queue.
In your case, from JMS server point of view, it looks like client asked for message but never acknowledged so it's still 'being processed' by the client. In such case message would be invisible for other consumers on the same Queue so you might get the impression that message was 'take off the queue' while as the matter of fact it's still there. Obviously you won't see such message in dead message queue either.
I suggest you read JMS specification to get clear understanding of different acknowledgement modes.
Call acknowledge() method on message in your consumer.
Consider the following scenario: An application receives but does not acknowledge a message. The application receives a subsequent message and acknowledges it. What happens to the former message? The former message is also considered acknowledged. Generally, acknowledging a particular message acknowledges all prior messages the session receives. In the above output, only message 5 is explicitly acknowledged. All the messages before message 5 are implicitly acknowledged. Messages after message 5 are not acknowledged.
For more details refer this article
Also Check this article Sun Java System Message Queue 4.3 Developer's Guide for Java Clients
Use following code it will work.
<bean id="{containerName}" class="org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer">
<property name="connectionFactory" ref={connectionFactoryBean} />
<property name="destinationName" ref="{queue}" />
<property name="messageListener" ref="{listner}" />
<property name="sessionAcknowledgeModeName" value="CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE"/>
</bean>