Currently, I am writing the automation testing using java and selenium rc.
I would like to verify all the contents present on the user interface, the function is ie below:
public String UITest() throws IOException {
String result="Test Start<br />";
try {
openfile(1);
for (String url : uiMaps.keySet()) {
selenium.open(url);
for (String item : uiMaps.get(url)) {
assertEquals(url+" check: " + item, true,selenium.isTextPresent(item));
result+=url+" check: " + item+" : OK<br />";
}
}
} catch (AssertionError e) {
result+=e.getMessage();
}
result+="Test finished<br />";
return result;
}
the function suppose return a String contains information about the testing. However, the function stopped once there is an assertion error happened.
So, I want to know whether there is a way to ignore the failure and keep executing all the assertion verifications.
Thanks for any help
You could use a JUnit 4 error collector rule:
The ErrorCollector rule allows
execution of a test to continue after
the first problem is found (for
example, to collect all the
incorrect rows in a table, and report
them all at once)
For example you can write a test like this.
public static class UsesErrorCollectorTwice {
@Rule
public ErrorCollector collector= new ErrorCollector();
@Test
public void example() {
String x = [..]
collector.checkThat(x, not(containsString("a")));
collector.checkThat(y, containsString("b"));
}
}
The error collector uses hamcrest Matchers. Depending on your preferences this is positive or not.
From Selenium documentation:
All Selenium Assertions can be used in 3 modes: "assert", "verify", and "waitFor". For example, you can "assertText", "verifyText" and "waitForText". When an "assert" fails, the test is aborted. When a "verify" fails, the test will continue execution, logging the failure. This allows a single "assert" to ensure that the application is on the correct page, followed by a bunch of "verify" assertions to test form field values, labels, etc.
I'm sure you've figured it out yourself by now: the try-catch should be inside the for loop, not outside of it ;)
Don't assert anything in the function. Return say null instead, and have whoever's calling it to keep going but then fail if the function returned null