File permissions; Should my www-folder content be

问题:

This might be a noob question, but can't find an answer anywhere.

I have a problem, which Another file permissions problem have helped me to ALMOST solve.

I have created a user in linux (danny) which has sudo access. I have also created a new group which name ALSO is danny, and added the user danny to that group. This group has sudo (root) access.

I have all files and folders in my www folder owned by danny/danny group.

I have an image-upload code which is php. This code cannot upload images to a folder called "images" folder which is under the www folder, UNLESS I give the images folder 777 permissions.

So, I have followed the answer on the linked question, and have figured out that the user which the upload-script is run as is "www-data".

According to the answer on the link to the other question I posted, I need to add www-data to a group... But I am stuck here...

Which group should I add to? What should I do from here?

Any tips are appreciated.

Btw, here is some info about www-data and danny

  id www-data:
  uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)
  id danny
  uid=1000(danny) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)

Thanks and if you need more input, just let me know...

回答1:

Actually, your problem is that you need the user www-data to have write-access to the images folder.

And you probably want user danny to have full access to the folder as well.

EDIT: Additional word of warning: having files writeable by your webserver is always a security risk. Be sure to check the files that are written, and make sure people can't upload or change code. Summary: * Don't let your webserver run scripts that are writeable, or in a writeable folder. So make sure only the images/ folder is writeable, and doublecheck that everything that is written, is actually an image!

Either:

1. Set www-data as owner of the folder, and chmod u+rwx www.
2. Set www-data as part of a group X, and change the owner of the folder to X, and chmod g+rwx www.
3. Set the folder world-writeable on your server (in some cases, an acceptable solution too, but less secure).

回答2:

In general, NO, your content should not be owned by www-data. The only content which should be owned by www-data are the specific files that you need web applications to be able to modify and specific directories that they need to be able to create or delete files in. The rest should not be owned (or writable) by www-data because every file that www-data can write to is a file that an attacker who compromises your web server (including any scripts or web apps that it is running) will be able to replace with whatever malicious data he may choose.

It is especially important that www-data not own or be able to write to any executable file (e.g., scripts, flash files, documents in Word or other formats with macro capabilities, etc.) because replacing them with malicious executables would provide an easy way to attack users' computers or the web server itself.

回答3:

I think it makes sense that files being used by www-data is owned by www-data. I mean who else should own it? The most important part is that the web app shouldn't have write access to its own web root. The reason why is becuase a directory traversal vulnerability in a PHP function like copy() or file_put_contents() might allow an attacker to drop a .php backdoor in your web root.

Another important attack to be aware of is that another process or user on the system might want to read or write to your web root, so its important that the very last number be a zero. The middle number is the group and your not using this, so it should be zero as well. The following 2 commands makes your web root readable and executable by apache, and only apache. Sometimes a different user account is used, so run a <?php system('whoami')?> to find out the correct user account.

chown www-data -R /path/to/webroot

chmod 500 -R /path/to/webroot

By the time the attacker has remote code execution to change the privileges of the web root its game over. The whole point is trying to foil the exploit from succeeding.

回答4:

I'd add www-data user to group danny.

usermod -a -G danny www-data

This way www-data could enter danny's place, but not the opposite.

In order to allow www-data user to write to a danny group folder permission mask has to be like (where wildcard means any value is ok):

d???rwx???