I have created a script like the one below to do something I called as "weighted" regression:
library(plyr)
set.seed(100)
temp.df <- data.frame(uid=1:200,
bp=sample(x=c(100:200),size=200,replace=TRUE),
age=sample(x=c(30:65),size=200,replace=TRUE),
weight=sample(c(1:10),size=200,replace=TRUE),
stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
temp.df.expand <- ddply(temp.df,
c("uid"),
function(df) {
data.frame(bp=rep(df[,"bp"],df[,"weight"]),
age=rep(df[,"age"],df[,"weight"]),
stringsAsFactors=FALSE)})
temp.df.lm <- lm(bp~age,data=temp.df,weights=weight)
temp.df.expand.lm <- lm(bp~age,data=temp.df.expand)
You can see that in temp.df
, each row has its weight, what I mean is that there is a total of 1178 sample but for rows with same bp
and age
, they are merge into 1 row and represented in the weight
column.
I used the weight
parameters in the lm
function, then I cross check the result with another dataframe that the temp.df
dataframe is "expanded". But I found the lm
outputs different for the 2 dataframe.
Did I misinterpret the weight
parameters in lm
function, and can anyone let me know how to I run regression properly (i.e. without expanding the dataframe manually) for a dataset presented like temp.df
? Thanks.