loadee.rb
puts '> This is the second file.'
loaddemo.rb
puts 'This is the first (master) program file.'
load 'loadee.rb'
puts 'And back again to the first file.'
When I run "ruby loaddemo.rb"
, This works fine. Both files are in the same directory, and that's the directory I run from.
But if I change the load to a require, and with or without the extension I get:
<internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require>:29:in `require': no such file to load
-- loadee.rb (LoadError)
from <internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require>:29:in `require'
from loaddemo.rb:2:in `<main>'
My question is of course, why isn't require working in this case? It should, right? Do load and require use different paths?
Ruby version 1.9.2
If you provide just a filename to require
, it will only look in the predefined $LOAD_PATH
directories. However, if you provide a path with your filename, it should work:
puts 'This is the first (master) program file.'
require './loadee.rb'
puts 'And back again to the first file.'
You could also add your project's folder to the load path instead:
$LOAD_PATH.unshift File.dirname(__FILE__)
puts 'This is the first (master) program file.'
require 'loadee.rb'
puts 'And back again to the first file.'
And last, you could just use require_relative
instead:
puts 'This is the first (master) program file.'
require_relative 'loadee.rb'
puts 'And back again to the first file.'
Providing a path with the filename seemed not to work for me, and I didn't want to cram a bunch of paths into my $LOAD_PATH
.
Checking out the documentation, I found require_relative
.
require_relative 'loadee'
Works in both 1.9.2
and 2.1.2
.
The documentation indicates that require
is not intended to search relative paths at all, and neither is load
.