I copied the following Ruby code from the Internet and made a few changes.
#insert code here
But it doesn\'t work!
Please help. What can I do to debug the program by myself?
I copied the following Ruby code from the Internet and made a few changes.
#insert code here
But it doesn\'t work!
Please help. What can I do to debug the program by myself?
Use Pry (GitHub).
Install via:
$ gem install pry
$ pry
Then add:
require \'pry\'
into your program.
In Ruby:
ruby -rdebug myscript.rb
then,
b <line>
: put break-point n(ext)
or s(tep)
and c(ontinue)
p(uts)
for display(like perl debug)
In Rails: Launch the server with
script/server --debugger
and add debugger
in the code.
As banister recommended: use pry! I can only agree on this.
pry is a much better repl than irb.
You need to add
require \'pry\'
to your source file and then insert a breakpoint in your source code by adding
binding.pry
at the place where you want to have a look at the things (this is like triggering a breakpoint in a classic IDE environment)
Once your program hits the
binding.pry
line, you\'ll be thrown right into the pry repl, with all the context of your program right at hand, so that you can simply explore everything around, investigate all objects, change state, and even change code on the fly.
I believe you can not change the code of the method that you are currently in, so you can sadly not change the next line to be executed. But good ruby code tends to be single line anyway ;-)
Debugging by raising exceptions is far easier than squinting through print
log statements, and for most bugs, its generally much faster than opening up an irb debugger like pry
or byebug
. Those tools should not be your first step.
Exception
then and .inspect
its resultThe fastest way to debug Ruby (especially Rails) code is to raise
an exception along the execution path of your code while calling .inspect
on the method or object (e.g. foo
):
raise foo.inspect
In the above code, raise
triggers an Exception
that halts execution of your code, and returns an error message that conveniently contains .inspect
information about the object/method (i.e. foo
) on the line that you\'re trying to debug.
This technique is useful for quickly examining an object or method (e.g. is it nil
?) and for immediately confirming whether a line of code is even getting executed at all within a given context.
byebug
or pry
Only after you have information about the state of your codes execution flow should you consider moving to a ruby gem irb debugger like pry
or byebug
where you can delve more deeply into the state of objects within your execution path.
When you are trying to debug a problem, good advice is to always: Read The !@#$ing Error Message (RTFM)
That means reading error messages carefully and completely before acting so that you understand what it\'s trying to tell you. When you debug, ask the following mental questions, in this order, when reading an error message:
nil
?) In the stack trace pay particular attention to lines of code that come from your project (e.g. lines starting with app/...
if you are using Rails). 99% of the time the problem is with your own code.
To illustrate why interpreting in this order is important...
You execute code that at some point executes as such:
@foo = Foo.new
...
@foo.bar
and you get an error that states:
undefined method \"bar\" for Nil:nilClass
Beginners see this error and think the problem is that the method bar
is undefined. It\'s not. In this error the real part that matters is:
for Nil:nilClass
for Nil:nilClass
means that @foo
is Nil! @foo
is not a Foo
instance variable! You have an object that is Nil
. When you see this error, it\'s simply ruby trying to tell you that the method bar
doesn\'t exist for objects of the class Nil
. (well duh! since we are trying to use a method for an object of the class Foo
not Nil
).
Unfortunately, due to how this error is written (undefined method \"bar\" for Nil:nilClass
) its easy to get tricked into thinking this error has to do with bar
being undefined
. When not read carefully this error causes beginners to mistakenly go digging into the details of the bar
method on Foo
, entirely missing the part of the error that hints that the object is of the wrong class (in this case: nil). It\'s a mistake that\'s easily avoided by reading error messages in their entirety.
Summary:
Always carefully read the entire error message before beginning any debugging. That means: Always check the class type of an object in an error message first, then its methods, before you begin sleuthing into any stacktrace or line of code where you think the error may be occurring. Those 5 seconds can save you 5 hours of frustration.
tl;dr: Don\'t squint at print logs: raise exceptions instead. Avoid rabbit holes by reading errors carefully before debugging.
Print out the variables whenever possible. (This is called printf debugging) You can do this by running
STDERR.puts x.inspect
or
STDERR.puts \"Variable x is #{x.inspect}\"
If you want to make this easier to type, then you may want to use the exemplor gem.
Turn warnings on. If you\'re running ruby
then run it with the -w
switch (eg ruby -w script.rb
). If you\'re running it from irb, and you\'re using a version of ruby prior to 1.9.2, type $VERBOSE = true
at the start of your session. If you misspell an instance variable, once warnings are on you\'ll get
warning: instance variable
@valeus
not initialized
Understand the concept of a binary chop (the following quote is from Practices of an Agile Developer)
Divide the problem space in half, and see which half contains the problem. Then divide that half in half again, and repeat.
If you\'re successful with a binary chop, you may find that there\'s a single line that doesn\'t do what you expect it to do. For example
[1, 2, 3].include?([1,2])
gives a value of false
, even though you\'d think it\'d return true
. In that case, you may want to look at the documentation. Web sites for documentation include ruby-doc.org, or APIdock. In the latter case, you\'d type include?
next to the magnifying glass near the top right corner, choose the include?
which has Array
underneath it (if you don\'t know what class [1, 2, 3]
is, type [1, 2, 3].class
in irb), and you get to include? (Array), which describes what it does.
However, if the documentation doesn\'t help, you\'re more likely to get a good answer if you can ask a question on how a specific line isn\'t doing what it should, rather than why an entire script isn\'t doing what it should.
All other answers already give almost everything... Just a little addition.
If you want some more IDE-like debugger (non-CLI) and are not afraid of using Vim as editor, I suggest Vim Ruby Debugger plugin for it.
Its documentation is pretty straightforward, so follow the link and see. In short, it allows you to set breakpoint at current line in editor, view local variables in nifty window on pause, step over/into — almost all usual debugger features.
For me it was pretty enjoyable to use this vim debugger for debugging a Rails app, although rich logger abilities of Rails almost eliminates the need for it.
deletes all the things
Welcome to 2017 ^_^
Okay, so if you\'re not opposed to trying out a new IDE you can do the following for free.
launch.json
to use \"cwd\"
and and \"program\"
fields using the {workspaceRoot}
macro\"showDebuggerOutput\"
and set it to true
\"debug.allowBreakpointsEverywhere\": true
vscode
; this is not the same as Visual Studio. It\'s free, light-weight, and generally positively regarded.View->Extensions
.vscode
and in there we\'ll but a file called launch.json
where we\'re going to store some config options.
launch.json
contents
{
\"version\": \"0.2.0\",
\"configurations\":
[
{
\"name\": \"Debug Local File\",
\"type\":\"Ruby\",
\"request\": \"launch\",
\"cwd\": \"${workspaceRoot}\",
\"program\": \"{workspaceRoot}/../script_name.rb\",
\"args\": [],
\"showDebuggerOutput\": true
}
]
}
File->Preferences->Settings
(or Ctrl, ) and scroll until you reach the Debug
section. Expand it and look for a field called \"debug.allowBreakpointsEverywhere\"
-- select that field and click on the little pencil-looking icon and set it to true
.After doing all that fun stuff, you should be able to set breakpoints and debug in a menu similar to this for mid-2017 and a darker theme: with all the fun stuff like your call stack, variable viewer, etc.
The biggest PITA is 1) installing the pre-reqs and 2) Remembering to configure the .vscode\\launch.json
file. Only #2 should add any baggage to future projects, and you can just copy a generic enough config like the one listed above. There\'s probably a more general config location, but I don\'t know off the top of my head.
-w
(warnings) flagI strongly recommend this video, in order to pick the proper tool at the moment to debug our code.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwgF8GcynV0
Personally, I\'d highlight two big topics in this video.
That\'s my two cents!
I just discovered this gem ( turns Pry into a debugger for MRI Ruby 2.0+ )
https://github.com/deivid-rodriguez/pry-byebug
break SomeClass#run # Break at the start of `SomeClass#run`.
break Foo#bar if baz? # Break at `Foo#bar` only if `baz?`.
break app/models/user.rb:15 # Break at line 15 in user.rb.
break 14 # Break at line 14 in the current file.
To easily debug Ruby shell script, just change its first line from:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
to:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby -rdebug
Then every time when debugger console is shown, you can choose:
c
for Continue (to the next Exception, breakpoint or line with: debugger
),n
for Next line,w
/where
to Display frame/call stack,l
to Show the current code,cat
to show catchpoints.h
for more Help.See also: Debugging with ruby-debug, Key shortcuts for ruby-debug gem.
In case the script just hangs and you need a backtrace, try using lldb
/gdb
like:
echo \'call (void)rb_backtrace()\' | lldb -p $(pgrep -nf ruby)
and then check your process foreground.
Replace lldb
with gdb
if works better. Prefix with sudo
to debug non-owned process.
As of Ruby 2.4.0, it is easier to start an IRB REPL session in the middle of any Ruby program. Put these lines at the point in the program that you want to debug:
require \'irb\'
binding.irb
You can run Ruby code and print out local variables. Type Ctrl+D or quit
to end the REPL and let Ruby program keep running.
You can also use puts
and p
to print out values from your program as it is running.
If you are using RubyMine, debugging ruby scripts is simple and straightforward.
Suppose you have a Ruby script hello_world.rb
Set a breakpoint at line 6 as below.
Now you can just start the debugger to run the script:
Then when the execution hits a breakpoint, you\'ll be able to inspect variables, etc.
printf debugging
There has always been a controversy around debugging techniques, some people like to debug by print statements, some other ones like to dig deep with a debugger.
I\'d suggest that you try both approaches.
Actually one of the old Unix men recently said, that printf debugging was a faster way to go for him at some points.
But if you are new at some job and need to understand a big blob of code, then it\'s really usefull to step throughout there, putting some breakpoints here and there, going along with it how it works.
It should give you some understanding how the code is weaved.
If you are new to some other peoples software, It might help you to step through there.
You\'ll quickly find out if they arranged it in a clever way, or if that\'s just a bunch of shit.
The mother of all debugger is plain old print screen. Most of the time, you probably only want to inspect some simple objects, a quick and easy way is like this:
@result = fetch_result
p \"--------------------------\"
p @result
This will print out the contents of @result to STDOUT with a line in front for easy identification.
Bonus if you use a autoload / reload capable framework like Rails, you won\'t even need to restart your app. (Unless the code you are debugging is not reloaded due to framework specific settings)
I find this works for 90% of the use case for me. You can also use ruby-debug, but I find it overkill most of the time.
Well, ruby standard lib has an easy to use gdb-like console debugger: http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.1.0/libdoc/debug/rdoc/DEBUGGER__.html No need to install any extra gems. Rails scripts can be debugged that way too.
e.g.
def say(word)
require \'debug\'
puts word
end
There is many debuggers with different features, based on which you make choice. My priorities was satisfied with pry-moves which was: