Is there a way to use fopen_s() with GCC or at lea

2019-03-15 03:02发布

问题:

MSVC compiler says that fopen() is deprecated, and recommends the use of fopen_s().

Is there any way to use fopen_s() and still be portable?

Any ideas for a #define?

回答1:

Microsoft's *_s functions are unportable, I usually use equivalent C89/C99 functions and disable deprecation warnings (#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE).

If you insist, you can use an adaptor function (not necessarily a macro!) that delegates fopen() on platforms that don't have fopen_s(), but you must be careful to map values of errno_t return code from errno.

errno_t fopen_s(FILE **f, const char *name, const char *mode) {
    errno_t ret = 0;
    assert(f);
    *f = fopen(name, mode);
    /* Can't be sure about 1-to-1 mapping of errno and MS' errno_t */
    if (!*f)
        ret = errno;
    return ret;
}

However, I fail to see how fopen_s() is any more secure than fopen(), so I usually go for portability.



回答2:

if you are using C11, fopen_s is a standard library:

http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/fopen

in gcc you need to use --std=C11 parameter.



回答3:

In C/C++ code,

#ifdef __unix
#define fopen_s(pFile,filename,mode) ((*(pFile))=fopen((filename),(mode)))==NULL
#endif

In Makefile

CFLAGS += -D'fopen_s(pFile,filename,mode)=((*(pFile))=fopen((filename),(mode)))==NULL'

Attention that on success fopen_s return 0 while fopen return a nonzero file pointer. Therefore it is necessary to add "==NULL" to the end of macro, e.g.:

if (fopen_s(&pFile,filename,"r")) perror("cannot open file");


回答4:

Many of Microsoft's secure functions are included in Annex K of the C11 standard, but it is not widely supported, so portability is still an issue. There is a need for the improved security in some applications; maybe the support will improve in the future.

I the past, I did it like this:

  #define fopen_s(fp, fmt, mode)          *(fp)=fopen( (fmt), (mode))

The macro is simple and straight forward, good enough for something quick and dirty, but it doesn't provide the exception behavior of fopen_s, and it won't provide the security of the real fopen_s function.

@Alex B's function approach above partially reproduces the proper behavior on failure; he returns errno (= EINVAL). His approach could be extended further by generating an invalid parameter exception to more fully reproduce the behavior of fopen_s.



回答5:

Accroding to https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/fopen it's possible to enable *_s functions on stdc library

"As with all bounds-checked functions, fopen_s is only guaranteed to be available if STDC_LIB_EXT1 is defined by the implementation and if the user defines STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1 to the integer constant 1 before including stdio.h."