I have created a Spark cluster on Openstack running on Ubuntu14.04 with 8gb of ram. I created two virtual machines with 3gb each (keeping 2 gb for the parent OS). Further, i create a master and 2 workers from first virtual machine and 3 workers from second machine.
The spark-env.sh file has basic setting with
export SPARK_MASTER_IP=10.0.0.30
export SPARK_WORKER_INSTANCES=2
export SPARK_WORKER_MEMORY=1g
export SPARK_WORKER_CORES=1
Whenever i deploy the cluster with start-all.sh, i get "failed to launch org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker" and some times "failed to launch org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master". When i see the log file to look for error i get the following
Spark Command: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -cp >/home/ubuntu/spark-1.5.1/sbin/../conf/:/home/ubuntu/spark->1.5.1/assembly/target/scala-2.10/spark-assembly-1.5.1->hadoop2.2.0.jar:/home/ubuntu/spark-1.5.1/lib_managed/jars/datanucleus-api->jdo-3.2.6.jar:/home/ubuntu/spark-1.5.1/lib_managed/jars/datanucleus-core->3.2.10.jar:/home/ubuntu/spark-1.5.1/lib_managed/jars/datanucleus-rdbms->3.2.9.jar -Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxPermSize=256m >org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master --ip 10.0.0.30 --port 7077 --webui->port 8080
Though I get the fail message but the master or worker become alive after a few seconds.
Can someone please explain the reason?
The Spark configuration system is a mess of environment variables, argument flags, and Java Properties files. I just spent a couple hours tracking down the same warning, and unraveling the Spark initialization procedure, and here's what I found:
sbin/start-all.sh
calls sbin/start-master.sh
(and then sbin/start-slaves.sh
)
sbin/start-master.sh
calls sbin/spark-daemon.sh start org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master ...
sbin/spark-daemon.sh start ...
forks off a call to bin/spark-class org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master ...
, captures the resulting process id (pid), sleeps for 2 seconds, and then checks whether that pid's command's name is "java"
bin/spark-class
is a bash script, so it starts out with the command name "bash", and proceeds to:
- (re-)load the Spark environment by sourcing
bin/load-spark-env.sh
- finds the
java
executable
- finds the right Spark jar
- calls
java ... org.apache.spark.launcher.Main ...
to get the full classpath needed for a Spark deployment
- then finally hands over control, via
exec
, to java ... org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master
, at which point the command name becomes "java"
If steps 4.1 through 4.5 take longer than 2 seconds, which in my (and your) experience seems pretty much inevitable on a fresh OS where java
has never been previously run, you'll get the "failed to launch" message, despite nothing actually having failed.
The slaves will complain for the same reason, and thrash around until the master is actually available, but they should keep retrying until they successfully connect to the master.
I've got a pretty standard Spark deployment running on EC2; I use:
conf/spark-defaults.conf
to set spark.executor.memory
and add some custom jars via spark.{driver,executor}.extraClassPath
conf/spark-env.sh
to set SPARK_WORKER_CORES=$(($(nproc) * 2))
conf/slaves
to list my slaves
Here's how I start a Spark deployment, bypassing some of the {bin,sbin}/*.sh
minefield/maze:
# on master, with SPARK_HOME and conf/slaves set appropriately
mapfile -t ARGS < <(java -cp $SPARK_HOME/lib/spark-assembly-1.6.1-hadoop2.6.0.jar org.apache.spark.launcher.Main org.apache.spark.deploy.master.Master | tr '\0' '\n')
# $ARGS now contains the full call to start the master, which I daemonize with nohup
SPARK_PUBLIC_DNS=0.0.0.0 nohup "${ARGS[@]}" >> $SPARK_HOME/master.log 2>&1 < /dev/null &
I'm still using sbin/start-daemon.sh
to start the slaves, since that's easier than calling nohup
within the ssh
command:
MASTER=spark://$(hostname -i):7077
while read -r; do
ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no $REPLY "$SPARK_HOME/sbin/spark-daemon.sh start org.apache.spark.deploy.worker.Worker 1 $MASTER" &
done <$SPARK_HOME/conf/slaves
# this forks the ssh calls, so wait for them to exit before you logout
There! It assumes that I'm using all the default ports and stuff, and that I'm not doing stupid shit like putting whitespace in filenames, but I think it's cleaner this way.