ElasticSearch returning only documents with distin

问题:

Let's say I have this given data

{
            "name" : "ABC",
            "favorite_cars" : [ "ferrari","toyota" ]
          }, {
            "name" : "ABC",
            "favorite_cars" : [ "ferrari","toyota" ]
          }, {
            "name" : "GEORGE",
            "favorite_cars" : [ "honda","Hyundae" ]
          }

Whenever I query this data when searching for people who's favorite car is toyota, it returns this data

{

            "name" : "ABC",
            "favorite_cars" : [ "ferrari","toyota" ]
          }, {
            "name" : "ABC",
            "favorite_cars" : [ "ferrari","toyota" ]
          }

the result is Two records of with a name of ABC. How do I select distinct documents only? The result I want to get is only this

{
                "name" : "ABC",
                "favorite_cars" : [ "ferrari","toyota" ]
              }

Here's my Query

{
    "fuzzy_like_this_field" : {
        "favorite_cars" : {
            "like_text" : "toyota",
            "max_query_terms" : 12
        }
    }
}

I am using ElasticSearch 1.0.0. with the java api client

回答1:

You can eliminate duplicates using aggregations. With term aggregation the results will be grouped by one field, e.g. name, also providing a count of the ocurrences of each value of the field, and will sort the results by this count (descending).

{
  "query": {
    "fuzzy_like_this_field": {
      "favorite_cars": {
        "like_text": "toyota",
        "max_query_terms": 12
      }
    }
  },
  "aggs": {
    "grouped_by_name": {
      "terms": {
        "field": "name",
        "size": 0
      }
    }
  }
}

In addition to the hits, the result will also contain the buckets with the unique values in key and with the count in doc_count:

{
  "took" : 4,
  "timed_out" : false,
  "_shards" : {
    "total" : 5,
    "successful" : 5,
    "failed" : 0
  },
  "hits" : {
    "total" : 2,
    "max_score" : 0.19178301,
    "hits" : [ {
      "_index" : "pru",
      "_type" : "pru",
      "_id" : "vGkoVV5cR8SN3lvbWzLaFQ",
      "_score" : 0.19178301,
      "_source":{"name":"ABC","favorite_cars":["ferrari","toyota"]}
    }, {
      "_index" : "pru",
      "_type" : "pru",
      "_id" : "IdEbAcI6TM6oCVxCI_3fug",
      "_score" : 0.19178301,
      "_source":{"name":"ABC","favorite_cars":["ferrari","toyota"]}
    } ]
  },
  "aggregations" : {
    "grouped_by_name" : {
      "buckets" : [ {
        "key" : "abc",
        "doc_count" : 2
      } ]
    }
  }
}

Note that using aggregations will be costly because of duplicate elimination and result sorting.

回答2:

ElasticSearch doesn't provide any query by which you can get distinct documents based a field value.

Ideally you should have indexed the same document with same type and id since these two things are used by ElasticSearch to give a _uid unique id to a document. Unique id is important not only because of its way of detecting duplicate documents but also updating the same document in case of any modification instead of inserting a new one. For more information about indexing documents you can read this.

But there is definitely a work around for your problem. Since you are using java api client, you can remove duplicate documents based on a field value on your own. Infact, it gives you more flexibility to perform custom operations on the responses that you get from ES.

SearchResponse response = client.prepareSearch().execute().actionGet();
SearchHits hits = response.getHits();

Iterator<SearchHit> iterator = hits.iterator();
Map<String, SearchHit> distinctObjects = new HashMap<String,SearchHit>();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
    SearchHit searchHit = (SearchHit) iterator.next();
    Map<String, Object> source = searchHit.getSource();
    if(source.get("name") != null){
        distinctObjects.put(source.get("name").toString(),source);
    }

} 

So, you will have a map of unique searchHit objects in your map.

You can also create an object mapping and use that in place of SearchHit.

I hope this solves your problem. Please forgive me if there are any errors in the code. This is just a pseudo-ish code to make you understand how you can solve your problem.

Thanks

回答3:

@JRL is almost corrrect. You will need an aggregation in your query. This will get you a list of the top 10000 "favorite_cars" in your object ordered by occurance.

{
    "query":{ "match_all":{ } },
    "size":0,
    "Distinct" : {
        "Cars" : {
            "terms" : { "field" : "favorite_cars", "order": { "_count": "desc"}, "size":10000 }
         }
    }
}

It is also worth noting that you are going to want your "favorite_car" field to not be analyzed in order to get "McLaren F1" instead of "McLaren ", "F1".

"favorite_car": {
    "type": "string",
    "index": "not_analyzed"
}

回答4:

For a single shard this can be handled using custom filter which also takes care of pagination. To handle the above use case we can use the script support as follows:

• Define a custom script filter. For this discussion assume it is called AcceptDistinctDocumentScriptFilter
• This custom filter takes in a list of primary keys as input.
• These primary keys are the fields whose values will be used to determine uniqueness of records.
• Now, instead of using aggregation we use normal search request and pass the custom script filter to the request.
• If the search already has a filter\query criteria defined then append the custom filter using logical AND operator.
• Following is example using pseudo syntax if the request is: select * from myindex where file_hash = 'hash_value' then append the custom filter as:
  select * from myindex where file_hash = 'hash_value' AND AcceptDistinctDocumentScriptFilter(params= ['file_name', 'file_folder'])

For distributed search this is tricky and needs plugin to hook into QUERY phase. More details here.