I have the following snippet:
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int x[2][3];
int y[2][3];
using std::swap;
std::cout << noexcept(swap(x, y)) << "\n";
return 0;
}
Using GCC 4.9.0, this prints 0
. I don't understand why.
According to the standard there's two overloads for std::swap
:
namespace std {
template<class T> void swap(T& a, T& b) noexcept(
is_nothrow_move_constructible<T>::value &&
is_nothrow_move_assignable<T>::value
);
template<class T, size_t N>
void swap(T (&a)[N], T (&b)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(swap(*a, *b)));
}
In my understanding the noexcept
specifier for the array should work recursively for multidimensional arrays.
Why is swapping multidimensional arrays not noexcept
?
While trying to find a minimal example that still behaves weirdly I came up with the following:
#include <iostream>
template<class T> struct Specialized : std::false_type {};
template<> struct Specialized<int> : std::true_type {};
template<class T> void f(T& a) noexcept(Specialized<T>::value);
template<class T, std::size_t N> void f(T (&a)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(f(*a)));
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int x, y[1], z[1][1];
std::cout << noexcept(f(x)) << " "
<< noexcept(f(y)) << " "
<< noexcept(f(z)) << "\n";
}
Using GCC 4.9.0 this prints 1 1 0
, but again I don't understand why.