Is there a way to use both or either display: grid/-ms-grid
into one style sheet or do I have to use an HTML hack or JavaScript to query what type of browser a page is being viewed with grid layout?
Example:
The following styling doesn't seem to work
.container {
display: grid -ms-grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(150px, 50px);
grid-gap: 1vw;
-ms-grid-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
-ms-grid-rows: repeat(150px, 50px);
-ms-grid-gap: 1vw;
}
Transforming new CSS Grid layout syntax to outdated IE's/Edge's is really a challenge. It's not just the matter of adding some vendor prefixes.
IE/Edge has very limited support of what is present in new version of CSS Grid Layout. There is no IE/Edge support of
- auto-placement and selecting its flow (
grid-auto-flow
CSS property);
- repeated columns/rows (
repeat
function and some special values like auto-fill
and auto-fit
). In some cases this mean that you'll just have to replace with explicit values, like in your case, you can replace grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr)
with -ms-grid-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr 1fr
and this will work perfectly. But if you have something like grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 1fr)
it's impossible to implement this in IE/Edge;
- grid cell gaps (
grid-row-gap
, grid-column-gap
, grid-gap
CSS properties). Gaps can be faked using additional grid tracks;
- automatically generated tracks (
grid-auto-columns
, grid-auto-rows
CSS properties);
- named grid areas (
grid-area
, grid-template-areas
CSS properties).
You just have to forget about this possibilities for IE.
Also some values of supported IE properties are not supported
Autoplacement
There is no auto-placement behaviour in IE/Edge implementation. This means that you have to position everything rather than use the auto-placement ability of grid.
If you don’t position items they will stack up in the first cell of the grid. That means that you have to set position explicitly for every single grid item or it will reside in first cell. If you have markup like this:
.wrapper {
display: -ms-grid;
display: grid;
grid-gap: 10px;
-ms-grid-columns: 50px 50px;
grid-template-columns: 50px 50px;
-ms-grid-rows: 50px 50px;
grid-template-rows: 50px 50px;
background-color: #fff;
color: #444;
}
.box {
border-radius: 5px;
padding: 20px;
font-size: 150%;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="box a">A</div>
<div class="box b">B</div>
<div class="box c">C</div>
<div class="box d">D</div>
</div>
You'll see something this in IE/Edge
So basically you have two options (methodologies) when developing CSS Grid for IE/Edge (if you know that layout in your case can be transformed):
Generate different markup for IE/Edge browser and other browsers. In this case you don't care about markup similarity (by the way your value of grid-template-rows: repeat(150px, 50px)
is invalid, so I assume you wanted grid-template-rows: 150px 50px
). Demo for you case
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: 150px 50px;
grid-gap: 1vw;
display: -ms-grid;
/* also faking 1vw grid-gap */
-ms-grid-columns: 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr;
/* also faking 1vw grid-gap */
-ms-grid-rows: 150px 1vw 50px;
}
.grid-item {
/* style just for demo */
background-color: yellow;
}
/* Explicit placement for IE/Edge */
/* Omitting default value of -ms-grid-column: 1 and -ms-grid-row: 1 where possible */
.grid-item:nth-child(2) {
-ms-grid-column: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(3) {
-ms-grid-column: 5;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(4) {
-ms-grid-column: 7;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(5) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(6) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(7) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 5;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(8) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 7;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="grid-item">1,1</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,2</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,3</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,4</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,1</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,2</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,3</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,4</div>
</div>
Generate very similar markup for IE/Edge browsers. In this case markup for all browsers will look very similar. This might be more maintainable because you shouldn't care about different approaches. Demo for you case:
.container {
display: -ms-grid;
display: grid;
/* also faking 1vw grid-gap */
-ms-grid-columns: 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr 1vw 1fr;
/* also faking 1vw grid-gap */
-ms-grid-rows: 150px 1vw 50px;
grid-template-rows: 150px 1vw 50px;
}
.grid-item {
/* style just for demo */
background-color: yellow;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(2) {
-ms-grid-column: 3;
grid-column: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(3) {
-ms-grid-column: 5;
grid-column: 5;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(4) {
-ms-grid-column: 7;
grid-column: 7;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(5) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
grid-row: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(6) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 3;
grid-column: 3;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(7) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 5;
grid-column: 5;
}
.grid-item:nth-child(8) {
-ms-grid-row: 3;
grid-row: 3;
-ms-grid-column: 7;
grid-column: 7;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="grid-item">1,1</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,2</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,3</div>
<div class="grid-item">1,4</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,1</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,2</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,3</div>
<div class="grid-item">2,4</div>
</div>
Your display
rule needs to be structured correctly. What you have is invalid.
display: grid -ms-grid;
Also, your grid-template-rows
rule is invalid. The first argument is supposed to be an integer that specifies the number of repetitions.
grid-template-rows: repeat(150px, 50px);
Also, I don't believe the repeat()
notation existed in the older specs. It looks like it was introduced in the current spec, so IE wouldn't support it.
-ms-grid-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
-ms-grid-rows: repeat(150px, 50px);
Lastly, it's best to put the official (W3C) properties after the prefixed versions so they are given priority in the cascade (more details).
Try this:
.container {
display: -ms-grid;
display: grid;
-ms-grid-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
-ms-grid-rows: 150px 50px;
grid-template-rows: 150px 50px;
-ms-grid-gap: 1vw;
grid-gap: 1vw;
}
The answer by Vadim is pretty much what you should do. But there are a few more CSS tricks you can use to ease your pain.
0. Be sure to read this blog post to decide whether you want to use grids for websites which support IE: https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2016/11/26/should-i-try-to-use-the-ie-implementation-of-css-grid-layout/
If your answer to the previous question is "Yes", read on:
- Use autoprefixer. It will replace some of the CSS-grid properties to their IE equivalent. But given how complex the grid properties can be (repeats, minmax, spans, etc), autoprefixer can't cover all cases.
A very trusty companion in cases when you want to write spec-compliant CSS, but still support IE is the @supports()
at-rule. I use it to use the more advanced grid properties such as grid-gaps
, etc:
.card-list {
grid-row: 4;
grid-column: 1 / 3;
padding: 1.5vh 1vh;
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
}
.card {
margin-bottom: 1vh;
}
.card:nth-of-type(odd) { /* takes care of IE */
margin-right: 1vh;
grid-column: 1;
}
.card:nth-of-type(even) {
grid-column: 2;
}
@supports(grid-gap: 1vh) { /* still using standard code! */
.card-list {
grid-gap: 1vh;
}
.card {
margin-right: 0;
margin-bottom: 0;
}
}