JSON has application/json
as a standard. For protobuf some people use application/x-protobuf
, but I saw something as odd as application/vnd.google.protobuf
being proposed. Do we have an RFC or some other standard that I can use as a reference for this?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
There's an expired IETF proposal that suggests application/protobuf
. It does not address the question how the receiving side could determine the particular message type. Previous discussions suggested using a parameter to specify package and message, e.g. application/protobuf; proto=org.some.Message
In practice, the types you listed seem to be indeed the ones in use, for example the monitoring system Prometheus uses application/vnd.google.protobuf
, and the Charles web debugging proxy recognizes application/x-protobuf; messageType="x.y.Z"
.