可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I'm trying to perform a group by action on an aliased column (example below) but can't determine the proper syntax.
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS 'FullName'
FROM customers
GROUP BY 'FullName'
What is the correct syntax?
EDIT
Extending the question further (I had not expected the answers I had received) would the solution still apply for a CASEed aliased column?
SELECT
CASE
WHEN LastName IS NULL THEN FirstName
WHEN LastName IS NOT NULL THEN LastName + ', ' + FirstName
END AS 'FullName'
FROM customers
GROUP BY
LastName, FirstName
And the answer is yes it does still apply.
回答1:
You pass the expression you want to group by rather than the alias
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS 'FullName'
FROM customers
GROUP BY LastName + ', ' + FirstName
回答2:
This is what I do.
SELECT FullName
FROM
(
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS FullName
FROM customers
) as sub
GROUP BY FullName
This technique applies in a straightforward way to your "edit" scenario:
SELECT FullName
FROM
(
SELECT
CASE
WHEN LastName IS NULL THEN FirstName
WHEN LastName IS NOT NULL THEN LastName + ', ' + FirstName
END AS FullName
FROM customers
) as sub
GROUP BY FullName
回答3:
Unfortunately you can't reference your alias in the GROUP BY statement, you'll have to write the logic again, amazing as that seems.
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS 'FullName'
FROM customers
GROUP BY LastName + ', ' + FirstName
Alternately you could put the select into a subselect or common table expression, after which you could group on the column name (no longer an alias.)
回答4:
Sorry, this is not possible with MS SQL Server (possible though with PostgreSQL):
select lastname + ', ' + firstname as fullname
from person
group by fullname
Otherwise just use this:
select x.fullname
from
(
select lastname + ', ' + firstname as fullname
from person
) as x
group by x.fullname
Or this:
select lastname + ', ' + firstname as fullname
from person
group by lastname, firstname -- no need to put the ', '
The above query is faster, groups the fields first, then compute those fields.
The following query is slower (it tries to compute first the select expression, then it groups the records based on that computation).
select lastname + ', ' + firstname as fullname
from person
group by lastname + ', ' + firstname
回答5:
Given your edited problem description, I'd suggest using COALESCE()
instead of that unwieldy CASE
expression:
SELECT FullName
FROM (
SELECT COALESCE(LastName+', '+FirstName, FirstName) AS FullName
FROM customers
) c
GROUP BY FullName;
回答6:
My guess is:
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS 'FullName'
FROM customers
GROUP BY LastName + ', ' + FirstName
Oracle has a similar limitation, which is annoying. I'm curious if there exists a better solution.
To answer the second half of the question, this limitation applies to more complex expressions such as your case statement as well. The best suggestion I've seen it to use a sub-select to name the complex expression.
回答7:
SELECT
CASE
WHEN LastName IS NULL THEN FirstName
WHEN LastName IS NOT NULL THEN LastName + ', ' + FirstName
END AS 'FullName'
FROM
customers
GROUP BY
LastName,
FirstName
This works because the formula you use (the CASE statement) can never give the same answer for two different inputs.
This is not the case if you used something like:
LEFT(FirstName, 1) + ' ' + LastName
In such a case "James Taylor" and "John Taylor" would both result in "J Taylor".
If you wanted your output to have "J Taylor" twice (one for each person):
GROUP BY LastName, FirstName
If, however, you wanted just one row of "J Taylor" you'd want:
GROUP BY LastName, LEFT(FirstName, 1)
回答8:
You can use CROSS APPLY
to create an alias and use it in the GROUP BY
clause, like so:
SELECT FullName
FROM Customers
CROSS APPLY (SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS FullName) Alias
GROUP BY FullName
回答9:
If you want to avoid the mess of the case statement being in your query twice, you may want to place it in a User-Defined-Function.
Sorry, but SQL Server would not render the dataset before the Group By clause so the column alias is not available. You could use it in the Order By.
回答10:
In the old FoxPro (I haven't used it since version 2.5), you could write something like this:
SELECT LastName + ', ' + FirstName AS 'FullName', Birthday, Title
FROM customers
GROUP BY 1,3,2
I really liked that syntax. Why isn't it implemented anywhere else? It's a nice shortcut, but I assume it causes other problems?
回答11:
SELECT
CASE WHEN LastName IS NULL THEN FirstName
WHEN LastName IS NOT NULL THEN LastName + ', ' + FirstName
END AS 'FullName'
FROM customers GROUP BY 1`
回答12:
For anyone who finds themselves with the following problem (grouping by ensuring zero and null values are treated as equals)...
SELECT AccountNumber, Amount AS MyAlias
FROM Transactions
GROUP BY AccountNumber, ISNULL(Amount, 0)
(I.e. SQL Server complains that you haven't included the field Amount in your Group By or aggregate function)
...remember to place the exact same function in your SELECT...
SELECT AccountNumber, ISNULL(Amount, 0) AS MyAlias
FROM Transactions
GROUP BY AccountNumber, ISNULL(Amount, 0)