What is the difference between the Schema.org properties isPartOf
and hasPart
and when to use the one instead of the other?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
As noted on their pages, they are inverse properties.
As an example, let’s take a webpage that is part of a website. You could then state one of these:
WebSite
hasPart
WebPage
WebPage
isPartOf
WebSite
It doesn’t matter which one you choose. (But there might of course be consumers that only recognize one of these properties.)
Note: Most of the time, Schema.org doesn’t define an inverse equivalent for a property. For example, there is author
, but no . This is because you can use every property for both directions, with the help of the syntax:authorOf
RDFa:
rev
(example)Microdata:
itemprop-reverse
(non-standard, which is one of the reasons to prefer RDFa over Microdata)
(example)JSON-LD:
@reverse
(example)