angularjs simple .then or $q service in async requ

问题:

I don't know what is the exactly difference between AngularJS $q service and simply using .then() after async request.

Simple example with .then() :

function InboxService($http) {
  this.getEmails = function getEmails() {
    return $http.get('/emails');
  };
}

And when using the service (just part of code):

InboxService.getEmails()
.then(function (response) {
  // use response
});

What is the difference with $q service with resolve and reject ?

回答1:

What is the difference with $q service with resolve and reject ?

I assume you are asking about the usage of var deferred = $q.defer() with subsequent deferred.resolve() or deferred.reject()? In this case, the answer is that you don't need it since you already have a promise object returned by $http service. In fact, manually constructing another new promise with $q is not recommended and considered an anti-pattern.

In cases where you work with asynchronous functions (timeouts, ajax-requests) that are not already wrapped into promise, then this is a case when you might want to use $q to create and return promise. But once again, in your case you don't need it as $http service constructs promise for you and one more is simply redundant.

回答2:

The $q is superfluous and in most cases is not needed. http://www.codelord.net/2015/09/24/$q-dot-defer-youre-doing-it-wrong/