可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
While reading up the documentation for dict.copy()
, it says that it makes a shallow copy of the dictionary. Same goes for the book I am following (Beazley\'s Python Reference), which says:
The m.copy() method makes a shallow
copy of the items contained in a
mapping object and places them in a
new mapping object.
Consider this:
>>> original = dict(a=1, b=2)
>>> new = original.copy()
>>> new.update({\'c\': 3})
>>> original
{\'a\': 1, \'b\': 2}
>>> new
{\'a\': 1, \'c\': 3, \'b\': 2}
So I assumed this would update the value of original
(and add \'c\': 3) also since I was doing a shallow copy. Like if you do it for a list:
>>> original = [1, 2, 3]
>>> new = original
>>> new.append(4)
>>> new, original
([1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4])
This works as expected.
Since both are shallow copies, why is that the dict.copy()
doesn\'t work as I expect it to? Or my understanding of shallow vs deep copying is flawed?
回答1:
By \"shallow copying\" it means the content of the dictionary is not copied by value, but just creating a new reference.
>>> a = {1: [1,2,3]}
>>> b = a.copy()
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3]}, {1: [1, 2, 3]})
>>> a[1].append(4)
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})
In contrast, a deep copy will copy all contents by value.
>>> import copy
>>> c = copy.deepcopy(a)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})
>>> a[1].append(5)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})
So:
b = a
: Reference assignment, Make a
and b
points to the same object.
b = a.copy()
: Shallow copying, a
and b
will become two isolated objects, but their contents still share the same reference
b = copy.deepcopy(a)
: Deep copying, a
and b
\'s structure and content become completely isolated.
回答2:
It\'s not a matter of deep copy or shallow copy, none of what you\'re doing is deep copy.
Here:
>>> new = original
you\'re creating a new reference to the the list/dict referenced by original.
while here:
>>> new = original.copy()
>>> # or
>>> new = list(original) # dict(original)
you\'re creating a new list/dict which is filled with a copy of the references of objects contained in the original container.
回答3:
Take this example:
original = dict(a=1, b=2, c=dict(d=4, e=5))
new = original.copy()
Now let\'s change a value in the \'shallow\' (first) level:
new[\'a\'] = 10
# new = {\'a\': 10, \'b\': 2, \'c\': {\'d\': 4, \'e\': 5}}
# original = {\'a\': 1, \'b\': 2, \'c\': {\'d\': 4, \'e\': 5}}
# no change in original, since [\'a\'] is an immutable integer
Now let\'s change a value one level deeper:
new[\'c\'][\'d\'] = 40
# new = {\'a\': 10, \'b\': 2, \'c\': {\'d\': 40, \'e\': 5}}
# original = {\'a\': 1, \'b\': 2, \'c\': {\'d\': 40, \'e\': 5}}
# new[\'c\'] points to the same original[\'d\'] mutable dictionary, so it will be changed
回答4:
Adding to kennytm\'s answer. When you do a shallow copy parent.copy() a new dictionary is created with same keys,but the values are not copied they are referenced.If you add a new value to parent_copy it won\'t effect parent because parent_copy is a new dictionary not reference.
parent = {1: [1,2,3]}
parent_copy = parent.copy()
parent_reference = parent
print id(parent),id(parent_copy),id(parent_reference)
#140690938288400 140690938290536 140690938288400
print id(parent[1]),id(parent_copy[1]),id(parent_reference[1])
#140690938137128 140690938137128 140690938137128
parent_copy[1].append(4)
parent_copy[2] = [\'new\']
print parent, parent_copy, parent_reference
#{1: [1, 2, 3, 4]} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4], 2: [\'new\']} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}
The hash(id) value of parent[1], parent_copy[1] are identical which implies [1,2,3] of parent[1] and parent_copy[1] stored at id 140690938288400.
But hash of parent and parent_copy are different which implies
They are different dictionaries and parent_copy is a new dictionary having values reference to values of parent
回答5:
\"new\" and \"original\" are different dicts, that\'s why you can update just one of them.. The items are shallow-copied, not the dict itself.
回答6:
Contents are shallow copied.
So if the original dict
contains a list
or another dictionary
, modifying one them in the original or its shallow copy will modify them (the list
or the dict
) in the other.
回答7:
In your second part, you should use new = original.copy()
.copy
and =
are different things.