I'm attempting to do a very basic connection to a sqlite v3 database and I'm using monodevelop 3.0 and Mono 2.10 and am unable to get connected to the database. I can make the app create the database, but then it immediately fails attempting to connect to it. Any suggestions? I had started with a different database, but then decided to have my app attempt to create a database empty and then connect to it. This still seems to fail.
SqliteConnection.CreateFile("db\\DataWorksProg.s3db");
SqliteConnection conn = new SqliteConnection("Data Source=file:db\\DataWorksProg.s3db");
conn.Open();
This small piece of code fails with an error about not being able to open the database file.
Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteException: Unable to open the database file
Permissions look OK and I have the Sqlite3.dll in the project, and it seems to be working OK. Have I missed anything obvious? I'm pretty good on the Visual Studio side, but still fairly fresh working in a Mono/Monodevelop environment.
What platform?
I don't believe you need to create a file. If it's not found, iirc, it'll make the database file.
Fwiw, on a Mac, I'm doing (note URI
to a pretty standard path; I haven't used Data Source
)...
using System;
using System.Data;
using Mono.Data.Sqlite;
namespace test
{
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
IDbConnection conTemp = null;
IDbCommand cmdTemp = null;
conTemp = (IDbConnection)new SqliteConnection ("URI=file:/Users/userName/mnmh.db");
conTemp.Open ();
cmdTemp = conTemp.CreateCommand ();
cmdTemp.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM employee";
IDataReader drTemp = cmdTemp.ExecuteReader ();
while (drTemp.Read()) {
Console.WriteLine (drTemp.GetString (0));
}
}
}
}
etc etc
Check the obvious -- you've referenced all the stuff you're using, etc.
Figured out my problem here. Apparently instead of using
"Data Source=file:db\\DataWorksProg.s3db"
I should have been using
"URI=file:db\\DataWorksProg.s3db"
Switched to the URI and it works as expected. I had thought from reading the docs that under the 2.0 profile, the DataSource part was needed instead of the URI, but I got the results I'm looking for.