I know that calloc allocates memory and writes zeroes to each cell, so my question is: is there a difference between using calloc or using malloc and running over the cells writing NULL to them? Are the zeroes of calloc equivalent to NULL?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
No, they are not always equivalent, but on most popular machines you'll be fine. calloc
writes a bit pattern of all-zeros to the allocated memory, but the null pointer value might not be all-bits-zero on some machines (or even just for some types on some machines).
Check out the Null Pointers section of the C FAQ for lots and lots of information.
回答2:
NULL isn't guaranteed to have all bits set to 0, even thought it always compares equal to the integer constant 0.
Calloc will set all of the bits to 0 the same as a memset call would. It is permitted that the resulting value(s) will not compare equal to NULL.
Therefore they are not equivalent.