Consider next example :
#include <iostream>
template< int a >
void foo();
int main(int argn, char* argv[])
{
foo<1>();
}
template<>
void foo<1>()
{
std::cout<<1<<std::endl;
}
The compilation fails with next error messages :
rg.cpp:12: error: specialization of ‘void foo() [with int a = 1]’ after instantiation
What paragraph in the standard explains this error?
PS :I know that if I move the function definition in front of main will make the error go away.
I think that's undefined behavior according to the standard. There are no restrictions on what a toolchain can do in cases of UB, generating a compiler error is one of the friendlier possibilities.
Section [temp.spec]
, 14.7p5 says
For a given template and a given set of template-arguments,
- an explicit instantiation definition shall appear at most once in a program,
- an explicit specialization shall be defined at most once in a program (according to 3.2), and
- both an explicit instantiation and a declaration of an explicit specialization shall not appear in a
program unless the explicit instantiation follows a declaration of the explicit specialization.
An implementation is not required to diagnose a violation of this rule.
Section [temp.expl.spec]
14.7.3p6 says:
If a template, a member template or a member of a class template is explicitly specialized then that specialization shall be declared before the first use of that specialization that would cause an implicit instantiation to take place, in every translation unit in which such a use occurs; no diagnostic is required.
Your program violates these requirements.