Find the list of member variables of a class and t

问题:

I haven't ever heard it's possible, but asking with the hope that it might.
For a class with many more member variables than this:

class A
{
 public:
  SomeOtherClass* s;
  int i;
  int j;
  A() {}
  A(const A& soc): s(soc.s->Clone()), i(soc.i), j(soc.j) {}
};

I always have to remember that if I add another variable int k to the class, I'll also have to add it in the initialization list k(soc.k) and sometimes in the destructor too. I've had to add/remove member variables so many times and it's really annoying to forget about the copying in the initialization list and finding the omission much much later while debugging.

Therefore, I wanted to know if there's a syntax/logic through which I can find out the list of member variables of a class and their types, so that I can maybe iterate through them and decide which of them need to be copied in the copy ctor and which of them need to be deep copied?

I don't see why the creators of C++ couldn't have included such a facility, since except for virtual members, the memory locations of variables would be contiguous and their types are known too. Even if they were extern or virtual, the type and size would be known at runtime. So shouldn't it be possible?

回答1:

There is no reflection in C++, so you'll need an external library to do this. The creators of C++ didn't implement this feature because it implies a performance penalty, and performance is one of C++'s main goals.

回答2:

I always have to remember that if I add another variable int k to the class, I'll also have to add it in the initialization list k(soc.k) and sometimes in the destructor too.

Yep, you do.

I've had to add/remove member variables so many times and it's really annoying to forget about the copying in the initialization list and finding the omission much much later while debugging.

Yes, it is.

Therefore, I wanted to know if there's a syntax/logic through which I can find out the list of member variables of a class and their types, so that I can maybe iterate through them and decide which of them need to be copied in the copy ctor and which of them need to be deep copied?

No, there isn't.

I don't see why the creators of C++ couldn't have included such a facility, since except for virtual members, the memory locations of variables would be contiguous and their types are known too. Even if they were extern or virtual, the type and size would be known at runtime. So shouldn't it be possible?

Yes, ideally.

C++ isn't really "that sort of a language", but it is a bit of a pain.

回答3:

please consult http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/defective.html#defect-6

for a point of view on the topic.

and as an answer, basically you can't do it.

回答4:

Yes well it do not answer your question but to solve your problem what I did in my code is to use a struct to hold the members that can be copied automatically so that I don't have to worry about them.

class A
{
 public:
  SomeOtherClass* s;

  class Members
  {
    int i;
    int j;
  };

  Members m;

  A() {}
  A(const A& soc): s(soc.s->Clone()), m(soc.m) {}

  void f() {
    m.j;//use j
  }
};

But generally I prefer to use deep_copy pointers so that I don't even need that trick (pointer are also copied automatically, when I can).

I posted about it some time ago : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/469696/what-is-your-most-useful-c-c-utility/1609496#1609496.

I'm not sure this will solve your problem with destructor (maybe the deep_copy pointer will).

If you're interested, I also suggest to check the posts that were talking about memberspace here on stackoverflow, which was basically using the same kind of trick for other means if I remember correctly.

回答5:

As noted, there is no reflection in C++. One simple thing you might do would be to check the size of the class. This could at least get you to look at the proper location by generating an error message if you forget to update the size after adding a member.

Example:

template<size_t Real, size_t Expected> struct check_size;
template<size_t Size> struct check_size<Size, Size> {};
// ...
A(const A& soc): s(soc.s->Clone()), i(soc.i), j(soc.j) {check_size<sizeof(A), 24> size_checker;}