Entity Framework Core: Fail to update Entity with

I have an entity that has a value object and this value object has another value object. My issue is that when updating the entity along with the value objects, the entity with the parent value object get updated but the child value object didn't. note, i used latest version of Entity Framework Core 2.1.0-rc1-final this is the parent entity Employee

public class Employee : Entity
{
    public string FirstName { get; private set; }
    public string LastName { get; private set; }
    public string Email { get; private set; }
    public Address Address { get; private set; }
}

and this is the parent value object Address

public class Address : ValueObject<Address>
{
    private Address() { }

    public Address(string street, string city, string state, string country, string zipcode, GeoLocation geoLocation)
    {
        Street = street;
        City = city;
        State = state;
        Country = country;
        ZipCode = zipcode;
        GeoLocation = geoLocation;
    }

    public string Street { get; private set; }
    public string City { get; private set; }
    public string State { get; private set; }
    public string Country { get; private set; }
    public string ZipCode { get; private set; }
    public GeoLocation GeoLocation { get; private set; }
}

and this is the child value object GeoLocation

public class GeoLocation
{
    private GeoLocation()
    {

    }

    public GeoLocation(decimal longitude, decimal latitude)
    {
        Latitude = latitude;
        Longitude = longitude;
    }
    public Decimal Longitude { get; private set; }
    public Decimal Latitude { get; private set; }
}

and when updating the employee, i first get it from database, then change Address property using the new value obtained from user interface

var employee = _repository.GetEmployee(empId);
employee.SetAddress(newAddress);

and the SetAddress method

public void SetAddress(Address address)
{
    Guard.AssertArgumentNotNull(address, nameof(address));
    Address = address;
}

According to this EF Core GitHub ticket you have to update the child/nested/owned type properties directly for it to track properly. This was supposed to be fixed in EF 2.1 (currently only available as a release candidate) but may have not made the cut. In 2.0.3 they updated the verbiage of the exception to:

InvalidOperationException: The instance of entity type 'Parent.Child#Child' cannot be tracked because another instance with the same key value for {'ParentID'} is already being tracked. When replacing owned entities modify the properties without changing the instance or detach the previous owned entity entry first.

The second part of this message will make you throw up a little if you are using DDD. It is telling you that you must update the properties of the child/nested properties directly for EF to properly track the changes (which breaks DDD Value Objects as being immutable). As per a comment on the GitHub thread here is a suggested, somewhat DDD friendly, workaround adapted to match your code:

public void SetAddress(Address address)
{
    Guard.AssertArgumentNotNull(address, nameof(address));    
    Address.UpdateFrom(address);
}
// And on Address:
internal void UpdateFrom(Address other)
{
    Street = other.Street;
    // ...
}

-OR-

The second suggested workaround is done by detaching the entity, updated the instance of Address, then re-attaching it. I didn't have much luck with this workaround in my implementation, but will post it for posterity. Maybe you'll have better luck with it than I did.

context.Entry(employee.Address).State = EntityState.Detached;
employee.SetAddress(newAddress);
context.Entry(employee.Address).State = EntityState.Modified;

UPDATE

I finally found the open ticket with the EF Core team that can be tracked for this issue. Ticket #10551 specifically states the issue at hand and is still open. It definitely didn't make it to EF Core 2.1 and appears to have been placed in the Backlog Milestone 3.0. Note you can up-vote this issue as a way to get the EF Core team to put more attention on it.