Performance differences calling sp_executesql with

Given:

CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[my_storedproc]
  @param1 int, @param2 varchar(100)
AS 
<<whatever>>
GO

Are there known performance differences between these different execution methods?:

-- Method #1:
declare @param1 int = 1
declare @param2 varchar(100) = 'hello'  
exec my_storedproc @param1, @param2

-- Method #2:  
exec my_storedproc @param1=1, @param2='hello'

-- Method #3:  
declare @param1 int = 1
declare @param2 varchar(100) = 'hello'  
declare @procname nvarchar(100) = N'my_storedproc @param1, @param2'
declare @params nvarchar(4000) = N'@param1 int, @param2 varchar(100)'  
exec sp_executesql @procname, @params, @param1, @param2

-- Method #4:  
declare @procname nvarchar(4000) = N'my_storedproc @param1=1, @param2=''hello'''
exec sp_executesql @procname

-- Method #5:  
declare @procname nvarchar(4000) = N'my_storedproc 1, ''hello'''
exec sp_executesql @procname

-- Method #6:  
declare @procname nvarchar(4000) = N'my_storedproc 1, ''hello'''
exec (@procname)

"Why do you ask?" you ask? I am trying to find a way to generically execute stored procedures entirely based upon metadata, the controlling stored procedure that will physically execute all the other configured (in metadata) stored procedures knows nothing about them other than what is defined in the metadata. Within this controller SP, I cannot (in any practical sense) know and declare the specific physical parameters (with their required data types) required for every possible stored proc that might have to be called - I am trying to find a way to execute them entirely generically, while still hopefully maintaining decent performance (reusing query plans, etc).

There really shouldn't be a performance difference between the 6 options since they are all executing the stored procedure and not any SQL statements directly.

However, there is no better indication of performance than testing this on your own system. You already have the 6 test cases so it shouldn't be hard to try each one.

Within this controller SP, I cannot (in any practical sense) know and declare the specific physical parameters (with their required data types) required for every possible stored proc that might have to be called

Why not? I don't see why you couldn't dynamically generate the SQL for Methods 2 and 3 based on the output of either of the following queries:

SELECT OBJECT_NAME(sp.[object_id]), *
FROM   sys.parameters sp
WHERE  sp.[object_id] = OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.my_storedproc');

SELECT isp.*
FROM   INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PARAMETERS isp
WHERE  isp.[SPECIFIC_NAME] = N'my_storedproc'
AND    isp.[SPECIFIC_SCHEMA] = N'dbo';

And with that info, you could create a table to contain the various parameter values for each parameter for each proc. In fact, you could even set it up to have some parameters with "global" values for all variations and then some parameter values are variations for a particular proc.