Dagger2 component with more than one dependencies

问题:

This is what I currently have and it works:

@FragmentScope
@Component(dependencies = {FacebookComponent.class}, 
           modules = {FragmentFacebookLoginModule.class})
public interface FragmentFacebookLoginComponent {

    void inject(FragmentFacebookLogin fragment);
}

Now I want to add another dependency. I changed it to this:

@Component(dependencies = {FacebookComponent.class, AnotherComponent.class}, 
           modules = {FragmentFacebookLoginModule.class})

But now I get this error message:

FragmentFacebookLoginComponent depends on more than one scoped component

How can I solve this? How can I have more than one dependencies?

If I remove the scope from one component I get this error message:

AnotherComponent (unscoped) cannot depend on scoped components

回答1:

I found the answer here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29619594/1016472

At the end I created a AppComponent with the right scope and let FacebookComponent and AnotherComponent extends this AppComponent.

FacebookComponent and AnotherComponent does not have it's own scope (I removed it).

Looks now like this:

@AppScope
@Component
public interface AppComponent {

}


@Component(modules = {FacebookModule.class})
public interface FacebookComponent extends AppComponent {

}


@Component(modules = {AnotherModule.class})
public interface AnotherComponent extends AppComponent {

}


@FragmentScope
@Component(dependencies = {FacebookComponent.class, AnotherComponent.class}, 
           modules = {FragmentFacebookLoginModule.class})
public interface FragmentFacebookLoginComponent {

    void inject(FragmentFacebookLogin fragment);
}

回答2:

What you want to be determined to be within the ApplicationScope should be all defined without a scope, and linked together under the application scope only in the ApplicationComponent under the given scope.

For example,

@Component(modules = {FacebookModule.class})
public interface FacebookComponent {
    FacebookThing facebookThing(); //assuming this is with @Provides in FacebookModule with NO SCOPE
}


@Component(modules = {AnotherModule.class})
public interface AnotherComponent{
    AnotherThing anotherThing(); //assuming this is with @Provides in AnotherModule with NO SCOPE
}

Then you can do

@AppScope
@Component(dependencies={AnotherComponent.class, FacebookComponent.class})
public interface AppComponent extends AnotherComponent, FacebookComponent {}

After which you can do

@FragmentScope
@Component(dependencies=AppComponent.class)
public interface FragmentComponent extends AppComponent {}

Please note that unscoped providers create a new instance on every inject call. If you need the scoping, you should bind the modules to the same component, but components should only depend on other components with the intention of subscoping.

回答3:

You can't use scoped components in a dependencies array (which is quite strange I have to say), only unscoped, or one scoped + other unscoped. But you can deceive dagger with "proxy" interfaces:

@Component
@Singleton
interface ComponentA {
    fun provideSomeA()
}

interface ProxyComponentA : ComponentA

@Component
@Singleton
interface ComponentB {
    fun provideSomeB()
}

interface ProxyComponentB : ComponentB

@Component(dependencies = [ProxyComponentA::class, ProxyComponentB::class])
@OtherScope
interface ComponentC

But in your ComponentC builder you should use proxy components implementations, which could easily be achieved with Kotlin:

class ProxyComponentAImpl(private val delegate: ComponentA) : ProxyComponentA, ComponentA by delegate
class ProxyComponentBImpl(private val delegate: ComponentB) : ProxyComponentB, ComponentB by delegate

componentA = DaggerComponentA.builder()...
componentB = DaggerComponentB.builder()...

componentC = DaggerComponentC.builder()
                   .componentA(ProxyComponentAImpl(componentA))
                   .componentB(ProxyComponentBImpl(componentB))

Works on dagger version 2.13, don't know about others

Also you could use vice versa inheritance ComponentA : ProxyComponentA to eliminate the need to create ProxyComponentAImpl, but it's not a good design choice if your ComponentA lays for example in a different gradle module

The solution was inspired by that issue discussion: https://github.com/google/dagger/issues/1225

回答4:

Include on your module the dependency module like this:

@Module(includes = FacebookModule.class)
public class AnotherModule {...