Why does nameof return only last name?

问题:

nameof(order.User.Age) return only "Age" instead of "order.User.Age"

What is the reason to do it in more restricted way? If we want only last name we could do something like

public static GetLastName(this string x) { 
    return string.Split(x, '.').Last();
}
nameof(order.User.Age).GetLastName()

And with one operator we could get both, "Age" and "order.User.Age". But with current implementation we can only get "Age".

Is there some logic behind this decision?

Edit: For example, such behavior is necessary for MVC binding

Html.TextBox(nameof(order.User.Age))

回答1:

Note that if you need/want the "full" name, you could do this:

$"{nameof(order)}.{nameof(User)}.{nameof(Age)}".GetLastName();

as long as all of these names are in the current scope.

Obviously in this case it's not really all that helpful (the names won't be in scope in the Razor call), but it might be if you needed, for example, the full namespace qualified name of a type for a call to Type.GetType() or something.

If the names are not in scope, you could still do the somewhat more clunky:

$"{nameof(order)}.{nameof(order.User)}.{nameof(order.User.Age)}".GetLastName();

-- although chances are at least one of those should be in scope (unless User.Age is a static property).

回答2:

Because it is exactly what for it've been invented. As you can read in already linked discussions, here you using the nameof operator as nameof(member-access), of the form E.I<A1…AK>, which will return:

These cases are all resolved using the rules for simple name lookup $7.6.2 or member access $7.6.4. If they succeed in binding, they must bind to one of:

• A method-group. This produces an error "To specify the name of a method, you must provide its arguments".
• A variable, value, parameter, constant, enumeration-member, property-access, field, event, type-parameter, namespace or type. In this case the result of the nameof operator is simply "I", which is generally the name of the symbol that the argument bound to. There are some caveats…

So in this case it, by its definition, have to evaluate all expressions before all the dots, step by step, and after that evaluate the last one to get its Name:

order.User.Age --> User.Age --> Age

回答3:

Take a look at this method taken from:

https://github.com/okhosting/OKHOSTING.Data/blob/master/src/PCL/OKHOSTING.Data/Validation/MemberExpression.cs

public static string GetMemberString(System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<T, object>> member)
    {
        if (member == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("member");
        }

        var propertyRefExpr = member.Body;
        var memberExpr = propertyRefExpr as System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression;

        if (memberExpr == null)
        {
            var unaryExpr = propertyRefExpr as System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression;

            if (unaryExpr != null && unaryExpr.NodeType == System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionType.Convert)
            {
                memberExpr = unaryExpr.Operand as System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression;

                if(memberExpr != null)
                {
                    return memberExpr.Member.Name;
                }
            }
        }
        else
        {
            //gets something line "m.Field1.Field2.Field3", from here we just remove the prefix "m."
            string body = member.Body.ToString();
            return body.Substring(body.IndexOf('.') + 1);
        }

        throw new ArgumentException("No property reference expression was found.", "member");
    }

回答4:

Some of the important purposes of using nameof is to get the last "name" in the expression.

For example nameof parameter when throwing ArgumentNullException:

void Method(string parameter)
{
     if (parameter == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(parameter));
}

MVC Action links

<%= Html.ActionLink("Sign up",
    @typeof(UserController),
    @nameof(UserController.SignUp))
%>

INotifyPropertyChanged

int p {
    get { return this._p; }
    set { this._p = value; PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(this.p)); }
}

More information: https://roslyn.codeplex.com/discussions/570551