MSI/WiX - Assigning Component GUID's during Mu

问题:

Using WiX 3.5, I have an MSI with instance transforms allowing me to install the software on the same machine with different product names. To do this, I have a "hard-coded" list of product id's and names in the .wxs file defined conditionally. However, I have only the single Feature-ComponentRef definition that includes both file and non-file resources.

Installation appears to work fine, but uninstalling the instances demonstrates the behaviour mentioned in these two sources:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367797(v=VS.85).aspx

and

http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-Transforms-Walkthrough-Proposed-Simple-Addition-to-WiX-to-Make-Them-Easier-td708828.html

Specifically, none of the non-file resources (in this case, registry entries) get uninstalled save the very last instance of my application. (i.e., if I uninstall in this order: instance1, instance2, and instance3 - only instance3's non-file resources are removed.

I am presuming this is related to not having unique GUID's for nonfile components (whereas this isn't an issue for file components)

So, I was wondering whether a valid approach would be to define a single .wxs file with one product id, name and one set of features, but have a custom bootstrapper generate new GUID's for the product and non-file components which then get inserted into the MSI database at runtime? i.e., Then when it comes time to uninstall or update, I would query the registry for installed instances and retrieve their GUIDs then.

This would permit instances to be created at runtime rather than hardcoded in the .wxs in advance, and to be uninstalled cleanly.

Does that make sense? Will Burn make everything better? :)

回答1:

As of version v3.6.1511.0, there is now a "MultiInstance" attribute for components. This allows a guid to be generated on the fly for each instance as per Josh Rowes suggestion in his post to the WiX mailing list (see the link in the OP). I have tested and this works correctly to cause registry data to be removed when the current instance is uninstalled, and not when the LAST instance is uninstalled.

回答2:

You don't need to have unique component ID's but you do need to have unique registry keys. Check out:

Authoring Multiple Instances with Instance Transforms

The article mentions:

To keep the nonfile data of each instance isolated, the base package should collect nonfile data into sets of components for each instance. The appropriate components should then be installed based on conditional statements that depend on the instance identifier.

I actually don't know what they are talking about there. I created n-Tier multiple instance installers where all the files were isolated by unique INSTALLDIR ( type 51 custom action at runtime to mutate the destination based on the InstanceID ) and all the registry data was mutated using the InstanceID as part of the path as mentioned in the article. I supported up to Sixteen unique instances with unique configuration data and unique version #'s ( each instance could be serviced via major upgrade apart from the other instances. ) All of this was to support a SaaS deployment model for an nTier application and I never ever had to create components with unique GUIDS and/or Conditional expressions.

The only thing wonky I had to do was on the client side they wanted a Shortcut on the desktop. (The Client supported multiple instances also because a site might have v1.0 in Production and v1.1 in Test )

Because I couldn't mutate the folder name (fixed) and because MSI's ShortCut table doesn't support formattable, I had to write a custom action to author the ShortCut dynamically at install table using the InstanceID into a TEMP table and then MSI created the shortcut for me.