EntityManager
is not thread-safe by definition.
Servlets specs says that in non-distributed environment and without implementing SingleThreadModel
, there is only one servlet instance per definition.
Therefore, in Java EE when you inject an EntityManager
through the @PersistenceContext
into Servlet's field - it's not thread safe:
public class MyServlet extends HttpServlet {
// Not thread-safe, should be using EMF instead.
@PersistenceContext
private EntityManager em;
}
Is this correct to say that even though the default scope of Spring beans is singleton, the
EntityManager
is thread-safe as the Spring usesThreadLocal
to bind its transaction andEntityManager
to it?Is the above Servlets example still valid in Spring? Is it still not thread-safe?
Does the
ThreadLocal
approach works only for Spring managed beans and plain servlet is not one of those?As far as I remember, it's the container responsibility to inject the
EntityManager
. In Glassfish Java EE implementation, it was the application server who discovers the@PersistenceContext
as injection point.
How does it look like in Spring? Is the Spring Framework responsible for discovering those annotations or it's responsibility of the JPA implementor?