Below is my Student class
class Student implements Comparable {
String name;
int rollNo;
@Override
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
return ((Student)obj).name.compareTo(this.name);
}
}
latest modification: but still no getting the right result
@Override
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
Student s = (Student) obj;
if (name.equals(s.name)) { // achieving uniqueness
return 0;
} else {
if (rollNo < s.rollNo) {
return -1;
} else if (rollNo > s.rollNo) {
return 1;
} else {
// this makes `name` the second ordering option.
// names don't equal here
return name.compareTo(s.name);
}
}
}
If I create object of TreeSet<Student>, I am getting sorted list of Student objects based on unique name & ordered by name also.
But I need unique student-name in my TreeSet<Student> with order by student-rollNo.
Is it possible with Comparator? Can anybody help me, Every suggestion is appreciated. Thanks.
UPDATE: here is the complete program:
public class Student implements Comparable {
int rollNo;
String name;
Student(String n,int rno) {
rollNo=rno;
name=n;
}
/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
TreeSet<Student> ts = new TreeSet<Student>();
ts.add(new Student("bbb",2));
ts.add(new Student("aaa",4));
ts.add(new Student("bbb",2));
ts.add(new Student("ccc",3));
ts.add(new Student("aaa",1));
ts.add(new Student("bbb",2));
ts.add(new Student("bbb",5));
System.out.println(ts);
}
@Override
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
Student s = (Student) obj;
if (name.equals(s.name)) { // achieving uniqueness
return 0;
} else {
if (rollNo < s.rollNo) {
return -1;
} else if (rollNo > s.rollNo) {
return 1;
} else {
// this makes `name` the second ordering option.
// names don't equal here
return name.compareTo(s.name);
}
}
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return name + rollNo;
}
}
Update:2: Thank you all for your suggestions, I still need some more :)
/*
* Actual scenario is having different properties,
* So here I am just relating my actual scenario with Student class
*/
class Student implements Comparable {
// sorting required on rollNo
int rollNo;
// Unique name is required
String name;
Student(String n, int rno) {
rollNo = rno;
name = n;
}
/**
*
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
TreeSet<Student> tsName = new TreeSet<Student>();
// here by default, order & uniqueness by name only
tsName.add(new Student("ccc", 2));
tsName.add(new Student("aaa", 4));
tsName.add(new Student("ddd", 1));
tsName.add(new Student("bbb", 3));
tsName.add(new Student("ddd", 5));
// output: aaa:4, bbb:3, ccc:2, ddd:1
System.out.println(tsName);
// creating new comparator for student RollNo
TreeSet<Student> tsRollNo = new TreeSet<Student>(new Comparator<Student>() {
public int compare(Student stud1, Student stud2) {
return new Integer(stud1.rollNo).compareTo(stud2.rollNo);
}
});
tsRollNo.addAll(tsName);
System.out.println(tsRollNo);
// now got the desire output: ddd:1, ccc:2, bbb:3, aaa:4
}
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
// internally not used to check equality while adding objects
// in TreeSet
System.out.println("equals() for " + this + " & " + ((Student) obj));
return false;// return false/true doesn't make any sense here
}
@Override
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
Student s = (Student) obj;
// internally inside TreeSet, compareTo is used to decide
// whether two objects are equal or not,
// i.e. compareTo will return 0 for same object(here student name)
System.out.println("compareTo() for " + this + " & " + ((Student) obj));
// achieving uniqueness
return name.compareTo(s.name);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return name + ":" + rollNo;
}
}
OUTPUT:
compareTo() for aaa:4 & ccc:2
compareTo() for ddd:1 & ccc:2
compareTo() for bbb:3 & ccc:2
compareTo() for bbb:3 & aaa:4
compareTo() for ddd:5 & ccc:2
compareTo() for ddd:5 & ddd:1
[aaa:4, bbb:3, ccc:2, ddd:1]
[ddd:1, ccc:2, bbb:3, aaa:4]
Friends, whatever I got by using two Comparators, Is it possible to
achieve the same while adding the objects ??
I cannot first Add elements & then use new comparator to achieve the desired order.
I am manipulating thousands of values so need to consider performance also.