I am starting with Git, so I feel that this question could be the newbiest question of day because this task is so simple, but it's causing a terrible headache..
I have 2 local branches:
And 2 remotes:
I need to pass local changes to production. So, my workflow was:
git checkout local/production
git merge master
git commit
git push
git merge:
Seems Work fine, it detected all differences.
git commit:
On branch local/production
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/production' by 2 commits.
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
And git push:
Everything up-to-date
So that's all, I couldn't push my changes to remote repository.
Root cause: To cut the explanation short, it appears to me that your local/production
is not tracking origin/production
. You can check this with git branch -avv
.
About git push
: Note that git push
without arguments will update all the remote branches that have updated in your local tracking branches (from the git-push(1)
manual page):
git push ... [<repository> [<refspec>...]]
The special refspec : (or +: to allow non-fast-forward updates) directs git to
push "matching" branches: for every branch that exists on the local side, the
remote side is updated if a branch of the same name already exists on the remote
side. This is the default operation mode if no explicit refspec is found (that is
neither on the command line nor in any Push line of the corresponding remotes
file---see below).
Because the result of simple git push
is sometimes little unexpected if forgotten what changes done in local branches, I personally like to explicitly specify which branches I want to push. In your case it seems this is what you want to do:
git push origin local/production:production
If you want local/production
to track origin/production
, you can make the local/production
tracking branch for origin/production
using option -u
:
git push -u origin local/production:production
(only required once). Then you can pull from origin to local/production
.
Executive Summary: you need to understand the concept of tracking branch and the peculiar semantics of git push
.
P.S. I am wondering about your choice of your branch name local/production
here. Why not just production
? I am suspecting you already have production
tracking origin/production
and maybe use local/production
for you local development. In this case a reasonable work flow is like this:
git pull origin production:production
to pull the changes to your production
- If there are new commits in
production
, that is local/production
is behind then either rebase your local/production
on production
(or merge production
on local/production
)
- the moment you want to push your changes,
merge
or cherry-pick
your commits to production
and push the changes with git push origin production:production
.