I'm trying to serialize/deserialize some case classes to/from Json... and I've troubles when dealing with case classes with just one field (I'm using Play 2.1):
import play.api.libs.json._
import play.api.libs.functional.syntax._
case class MyType(type: String)
object MyType {
implicit val myTypeJsonWrite = new Writes[MyType] {
def writes(type: MyType): JsValue = {
Json.obj(
"type" -> MyType.type
)
}
}
implicit val myTypeJsonRead = (
(__ \ 'type).read[String]
)(MyType.apply _)
}
The code above always generates the following error message:
[error] /home/j3d/Projects/test/app/models/MyType.scala:34: overloaded method value read with alternatives:
[error] (t: String)play.api.libs.json.Reads[String] <and>
[error] (implicit r: play.api.libs.json.Reads[String])play.api.libs.json.Reads[String]
[error] cannot be applied to (String => models.MyType)
[error] (__ \ 'method).read[String]
[error] ^
I know... a case class that contains just a string does not make much sense... but I need to serialize/deserialize a case class very similar to the one I described above that comes from an external library.
Any idea? Am I missing something? Any help would be really appreciated... I'm getting crazy :-( Thanks.
Json combinators doesn't work for single field case class in Play 2.1 (it should be possible in 2.2)
Pascal (writer of this API) has explained this situation here https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!starred/play-framework/hGrveOkbJ6U
There are some workarounds which works, like this one:
case class MyType(value: String)
val myTypeRead = (__ \ 'value).read[String].map(v => MyType(v)) // covariant map
ps: type
is a keyword in Scala, it can't be used as parameter name (but I assume it's just for this example)
edit: This workaround is not yet required with play 2.3.X. The macro works fine.
Problem is that (as far as I can tell) the Play 2.1 framework only handles tuples starting from Tuple2
. In the examples it's used like this:
case class CaseClass(key1: String, key2: String)
object CaseClass {
implicit val caseClassFormat = {
val jsonDescription =
(__ \ "key1").format[String] and (__ \ "key2").format[String]
jsonDescription(CaseClass.apply _, unlift(CaseClass.unapply))
}
}
And then to use it
val caseClassJson = Json.toJson(CaseClass("value1", "value2"))
println(caseClassJson)
println(Json.fromJson[CaseClass](caseClassJson))
In your case you can not use the and
method (you only have one value) and thus get no access to that nice apply
function of FunctionalBuilder#CanBuildX
(where X is 1 to 22).
In order to supply something similar you can create an implicit class that provides a build
method with a similar signature as that nice apply
method
implicit class FormatBuilder[M[_], A](o: M[A]) {
def build[B](f1: A => B, f2: B => A)(implicit fu: InvariantFunctor[M]) =
fu.inmap[A, B](o, f1, f2)
}
Now you can adjust your case class like this
case class MyType(tpe: String)
object MyType {
implicit val myTypeFormat =
((__ \ "type").format[String]) build (MyType.apply _, unlift(MyType.unapply))
}
Then you can use it like this
val myTypeJson = Json.toJson(MyType("bar"))
println(myTypeJson)
println(Json.fromJson[MyType](myTypeJson))
why not simply add a unused field to the case class. put a decent comment or use a field name that is self explanatory.
//f2 is unused field for de/serialization convenience due to limitation in play
case class SingleField(f1: String, f2: Option[String])
object SingleField {
implicit val readSingleField : Reads[SingleField] = (
(__ \ "f1").read[String] and
(__ \ "f2").readNullable[String])(SingleField.apply _)
}