How do I use reflection to invoke a private method

问题:

There are a group of private methods in my class, and I need to call one dynamically based on an input value. Both the invoking code and the target methods are in the same instance. The code looks like this:

MethodInfo dynMethod = this.GetType().GetMethod(\"Draw_\" + itemType);
dynMethod.Invoke(this, new object[] { methodParams });

In this case, GetMethod() will not return private methods. What BindingFlags do I need to supply to GetMethod() so that it can locate private methods?

回答1:

Simply change your code to use the overloaded version of GetMethod that accepts BindingFlags:

MethodInfo dynMethod = this.GetType().GetMethod(\"Draw_\" + itemType, 
    BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
dynMethod.Invoke(this, new object[] { methodParams });

Here\'s the BindingFlags enumeration documentation.

回答2:

BindingFlags.NonPublic will not return any results by itself. As it turns out, combining it with BindingFlags.Instance does the trick.

MethodInfo dynMethod = this.GetType().GetMethod(\"Draw_\" + itemType, 
    BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);

回答3:

And if you really want to get yourself in trouble, make it easier to execute by writing an extension method:

static class AccessExtensions
{
    public static object call(this object o, string methodName, params object[] args)
    {
        var mi = o.GetType ().GetMethod (methodName, System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance );
        if (mi != null) {
            return mi.Invoke (o, args);
        }
        return null;
    }
}

And usage:

    class Counter
    {
        public int count { get; private set; }
        void incr(int value) { count += value; }
    }

    [Test]
    public void making_questionable_life_choices()
    {
        Counter c = new Counter ();
        c.call (\"incr\", 2);             // \"incr\" is private !
        c.call (\"incr\", 3);
        Assert.AreEqual (5, c.count);
    }

回答4:

Microsoft recently modified the reflection API rendering most of these answers obsolete. The following should work on modern platforms (including Xamarin.Forms and UWP):

obj.GetType().GetTypeInfo().GetDeclaredMethod(\"MethodName\").Invoke(obj, yourArgsHere);

Or as an extension method:

public static object InvokeMethod<T>(this T obj, string methodName, params object[] args)
{
    var type = typeof(T);
    var method = type.GetTypeInfo().GetDeclaredMethod(methodName);
    return method.Invoke(obj, args);
}

Note:

• If the desired method is in a superclass of obj the T generic must be explicitly set to the type of the superclass.

• If the method is asynchronous you can use await (Task) obj.InvokeMethod(…).

回答5:

Are you absolutely sure this can\'t be done through inheritance? Reflection is the very last thing you should look at when solving a problem, it makes refactoring, understanding your code, and any automated analysis more difficult.

It looks like you should just have a DrawItem1, DrawItem2, etc class that override your dynMethod.

回答6:

Reflection especially on private members is wrong

• Reflection breaks type safety. You can try to invoke a method that doesn\'t exists (anymore), or with the wrong parameters, or with too much parameters, or not enough... or even in the wrong order (this one my favourite :) ). By the way return type could change as well.
• Reflection is slow.

Private members reflection breaks encapsulation principle and thus exposing your code to the following :

• Increase complexity of your code because it has to handle the inner behavior of the classes. What is hidden should remain hidden.
• Makes your code easy to break as it will compile but won\'t run if the method changed its name.
• Makes the private code easy to break because if it is private it is not intended to be called that way. Maybe the private method expects some inner state before being called.

What if I must do it anyway ?

There are so cases, when you depend on a third party or you need some api not exposed, you have to do some reflection. Some also use it to test some classes they own but that they don\'t want to change the interface to give access to the inner members just for tests.

If you do it, do it right

• Mitigate the easy to break:

To mitigate the easy to break issue, the best is to detect any potential break by testing in unit tests that would run in a continuous integration build or such. Of course, it means you always use the same assembly (which contains the private members). If you use a dynamic load and reflection, you like play with fire, but you can always catch the Exception that the call may produce.

• Mitigate the slowness of reflection:

In the recent versions of .Net Framework, CreateDelegate beat by a factor 50 the MethodInfo invoke:

// The following should be done once since this does some reflection
var method = this.GetType().GetMethod(\"Draw_\" + itemType, 
  BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);

// Here we create a Func that targets the instance of type which has the 
// Draw_ItemType method
var draw = (Func<TInput, Output[]>)_method.CreateDelegate(
                 typeof(Func<TInput, TOutput[]>), this);

draw calls will be around 50x faster than MethodInfo.Invoke use draw as a standard Func like that:

var res = draw(methodParams);

Check this post of mine to see benchmark on different method invocations

回答7:

Could you not just have a different Draw method for each type that you want to Draw? Then call the overloaded Draw method passing in the object of type itemType to be drawn.

Your question does not make it clear whether itemType genuinely refers to objects of differing types.

回答8:

I think you can pass it BindingFlags.NonPublic where it is the GetMethod method.

回答9:

Invokes any method despite its protection level on object instance. Enjoy!

public static object InvokeMethod(object obj, string methodName, params object[] methodParams)
{
    var methodParamTypes = methodParams?.Select(p => p.GetType()).ToArray() ?? new Type[] { };
    var bindingFlags = BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static;
    MethodInfo method = null;
    var type = obj.GetType();
    while (method == null && type != null)
    {
        method = type.GetMethod(methodName, bindingFlags, Type.DefaultBinder, methodParamTypes, null);
        type = type.BaseType;
    }

    return method?.Invoke(obj, methodParams);
}

回答10:

BindingFlags.NonPublic

回答11:

Read this (supplementary) answer (that is sometimes the answer) to understand where this is going and why some people in this thread complain that \"it is still not working\"

I wrote exactly same code as one of the answers here. But I still had an issue. I placed break point on

var mi = o.GetType().GetMethod(methodName, BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance );

It executed but mi == null

And it continued behavior like this until I did \"re-build\" on all projects involved. I was unit testing one assembly while the reflection method was sitting in third assembly. It was totally confusing but I used Immediate Window to discover methods and I found that a private method I tried to unit test had old name (I renamed it). This told me that old assembly or PDB is still out there even if unit test project builds - for some reason project it tests didn\'t built. \"rebuild\" worked