I have found that in all examples (include rails documentation) that I have seen for the :if option of validation methods uses Proc.new instead of lambda, for example
class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_presence_of :name, :if => Proc.new{|f| .... } # why not lambda here?
end
is there any reason for this?
As far as I know, lambda
- Is more strict with arguments.
- Also return statement in lambda block returns from the block, not from calling function.
Both seems to be desirable behavior for :if option mentioned above, is there anything I am missing?
Both seems to be desirable behavior for :if option mentioned above, is there anything I am missing?
I'm guessing that:
It's more desirable to allow Procs as they don't care about the number of arguments. So I could easily write any of the below:
validates_presence_of :name, :if => Proc.new{|f| f.display_name.blank? } # I care about 'f' here as I need it to check something.
... and:
validates_presence_of :secret_sauce, :if => Proc.new{ MyApp::REQUIRE_SECRET_SAUCE } # I don't care about any arguments being passed in.
This may seem like a minor thing, but I guess it adds to the flexibility.