YAML mime type?

问题:

What is the most appropriate MIME type to use when sending data structured with YAML over HTTP?

An explanation of why a given choice is most appropriate would be much appreciated.

There is no registered application type or text type that I can see.

Example:

> GET /example.yaml

< Content-Type: ????
<
< --- # Favorite movies
< - Casablanca
< - North by Northwest
< - Notorious

Possible options:

text/yaml
text/x-yaml
application/yaml
application/x-yaml

回答1:

Ruby on Rails uses application/x-yaml with an alternative of text/yaml (source).

I think it's just a matter of convention, there is no technical why, as far as I can tell.

回答2:

Although another answer was accepted, please refer to this Proposed media type registration for YAML thread on the IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type in which Ben Harris, University of Cambridge Information Services, proposed in July 2015 on behalf of the YAML team the media type:

text/vnd.yaml

with (suggested) deprecated aliases:

text/yaml
text/x-yaml
application/x-yaml

That is still proposed/pending (the thread does not indicate status of the proposal) so this answer is no more definitive than the others :-)

回答3:

I'd say text/x-yaml:

text over application because it's a human-readable

x-yaml over yaml because it hasn't been accepted into the registered list of mime types.

Edit: from RFC 3023 (XML Media Types):

The top-level media type "text" has some restrictions on MIME entities and they are described in [RFC2045] and [RFC2046]. In particular, the UTF-16 family, UCS-4, and UTF-32 are not allowed (except over HTTP[RFC2616], which uses a MIME-like mechanism).

Interesting... Not exactly sure what it means, but food for thought.

回答4:

"x-" media types are discouraged, see RFC 4288, Section 3.4. The right thing to do is to use the personal tree, the vendor tree, or to actually attempt a proper media type registration.