In C# you can write:
using System.Numerics;
namespace ExtensionTest {
public static class MyExtensions {
public static BigInteger Square(this BigInteger n) {
return n * n;
}
static void Main(string[] args) {
BigInteger two = new BigInteger(2);
System.Console.WriteLine("The square of 2 is " + two.Square());
}
}}
How would this simple extension method look like in Scala?
The Pimp My Library pattern is the analogous construction:
object MyExtensions {
implicit def richInt(i: Int) = new {
def square = i * i
}
}
object App extends Application {
import MyExtensions._
val two = 2
println("The square of 2 is " + two.square)
}
Per @Daniel Spiewak's comments, this will avoid reflection on method invocation, aiding performance:
object MyExtensions {
class RichInt(i: Int) {
def square = i * i
}
implicit def richInt(i: Int) = new RichInt(i)
}
Since version 2.10 of Scala, it is possible to make an entire class eligible for implicit conversion
implicit class RichInt(i: Int) {
def square = i * i
}
In addition, it is possible to avoid creating an instance of the extension type by having it extend AnyVal
implicit class RichInt(val i: Int) extends AnyVal {
def square = i * i
}
For more information on implicit classes and AnyVal, limitations and quirks, consult the official documentation:
- http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/implicit-classes.html
- http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/value-classes.html
This would be the code after Daniel's comment.
object MyExtensions {
class RichInt( i: Int ) {
def square = i * i
}
implicit def richInt( i: Int ) = new RichInt( i )
def main( args: Array[String] ) {
println("The square of 2 is: " + 2.square )
}
}
In Scala we use the so-called (by the inventor of the language) Pimp My Library pattern, which is much discussed and pretty easy to find on the Web, if you use a string (not keyword) search.