What is the difference between Parse() and TryParse()?
int number = int.Parse(textBoxNumber.Text);
// The Try-Parse Method
int.TryParse(textBoxNumber.Text, out number);
Is there some form of error-checking like a Try-Catch Block?
What is the difference between Parse() and TryParse()?
int number = int.Parse(textBoxNumber.Text);
// The Try-Parse Method
int.TryParse(textBoxNumber.Text, out number);
Is there some form of error-checking like a Try-Catch Block?
Parse
throws an exception if it cannot parse the value, whereas TryParse
returns a bool
indicating whether it succeeded.
TryParse
does not just try
/catch
internally - the whole point of it is that it is implemented without exceptions so that it is fast. In fact the way it is most likely implemented is that internally the Parse
method will call TryParse
and then throw an exception if it returns false
.
In a nutshell, use Parse
if you are sure the value will be valid; otherwise use TryParse
.
If the string can not be converted to an integer, then
int.Parse()
will throw an exceptionint.TryParse()
will return false (but not throw an exception)The TryParse method allows you to test whether something is parseable. If you try Parse as in the first instance with an invalid int, you\'ll get an exception while in the TryParse, it returns a boolean letting you know whether the parse succeeded or not.
As a footnote, passing in null to most TryParse methods will throw an exception.
TryParse and the Exception Tax
Parse throws an exception if the conversion from a string to the specified datatype fails, whereas TryParse explicitly avoids throwing an exception.
TryParse does not return the value, it returns a status code to indicate whether the parse succeeded (and doesn\'t throw an exception).
For the record, I am testing two codes: That simply try to convert from a string to a number and if it fail then assign number to zero.
if (!Int32.TryParse(txt,out tmpint)) {
tmpint = 0;
}
and:
try {
tmpint = Convert.ToInt32(txt);
} catch (Exception) {
tmpint = 0;
}
For c#, the best option is to use tryparse because try&Catch alternative thrown the exception
A first chance exception of type \'System.FormatException\' occurred in mscorlib.dll
That it is painful slow and undesirable, however, the code does not stop unless Debug\'s exception are settled for stop with it.
I know its a very old post but thought of sharing few more details on Parse vs TryParse.
I had a scenario where DateTime needs to be converted to String and if datevalue null or string.empty we were facing an exception. In order to overcome this, we have replaced Parse with TryParse and will get default date.
Old Code:
dTest[i].StartDate = DateTime.Parse(StartDate).ToString(\"MM/dd/yyyy\");
dTest[i].EndDate = DateTime.Parse(EndDate).ToString(\"MM/dd/yyyy\");
New Code:
DateTime startDate = default(DateTime);
DateTime endDate=default(DateTime);
DateTime.TryParse(dPolicyPaidHistories[i].StartDate, out startDate);
DateTime.TryParse(dPolicyPaidHistories[i].EndDate, out endDate);
Have to declare another variable and used as Out for TryParse.
double.Parse(\"-\"); raises an exception, while double.TryParse(\"-\", out parsed); parses to 0 so I guess TryParse does more complex conversions.